Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 53

Thread: Zuck Goes Too Far: Snoop Dogg Encourages Everyone to Post Louis Farrakhan Footage on Facebook and Instagram

  1. #11
    SackMan518's Avatar
    Range Member

    Status
    Online
    Join Date
    Oct 31, 2017
    Posts
    3,762
    Groan
    0
    Groans: 0
    Surprise! Look at this LOLberal leader with the Calypso singer.

    Sack

  2. #12
    Angry Byrds's Avatar
    Range Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 29, 2008
    Posts
    7,465
    Groan
    0
    Groans: 0
    Quote Originally Posted by SackMan518 View Post
    Surprise! Look at this LOLberal leader with the Calypso singer.

    Does this make Obama alt left or is this a normal left thing? The Charmers

  3. #13
    junglesouljah's Avatar
    waffle=pancake syrup trap

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Oct 14, 2001
    Posts
    21,076
    Groan
    0
    Groans: 0
    Quote Originally Posted by Angry Byrds View Post
    Are you asking this in defense of him, or because he’s a nut job?
    If David Duke can have a platform to talk than Louis Farrakhan can have a platform to talk.
    L*t is a losser


  4. #14
    Angry Byrds's Avatar
    Range Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 29, 2008
    Posts
    7,465
    Groan
    0
    Groans: 0
    Quote Originally Posted by junglesouljah View Post
    If David Duke can have a platform to talk than Louis Farrakhan can have a platform to talk.
    That’s fine, but you asked what was wrong with him. If you have to ask what’s wrong with him, you either agree with him, or you never heard of him lol. I can tell you what’s wrong with David Duke I don’t even have to ask. I’m a Christian, and if Duke was a Pastor at my church I certainly would not continue going to that church

  5. #15
    HipKat's Avatar
    Fah Q

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 11, 2017
    Posts
    4,701
    Groan
    0
    Groans: 0
    Quote Originally Posted by Angry Byrds View Post
    Why do you care? You’re not a liberal, it’s just the Article title.

    If it’s a racist white person he’s alt-right, if he’s a racist Liberal he’s just a racist with no party affiliations lol
    Why do I care? Because I hate manipulative lying little pricks who try to sway people into agreeing with their stupid agenda
    “There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.
    A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.
    Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”


    Hipkat, on *** other h***, is genuine, unapoli***tically nasty, and w**** his hea** on his ******. - jc856

  6. #16
    Angry Byrds's Avatar
    Range Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 29, 2008
    Posts
    7,465
    Groan
    0
    Groans: 0
    Quote Originally Posted by HipKat View Post
    Why do I care? Because I hate manipulative lying little pricks who try to sway people into agreeing with their stupid agenda
    Thank you for only answering part of the post, but again Sack didn’t title the article.

  7. #17
    HipKat's Avatar
    Fah Q

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 11, 2017
    Posts
    4,701
    Groan
    0
    Groans: 0
    Quote Originally Posted by Angry Byrds View Post
    Does this make Obama alt left or is this a normal left thing? The Charmers
    Donald Trump and David Duke: For the record

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.88d47cc72d2a

    Here is a full chronology of Donald Trump’s statements on white supremacist David Duke.

    Unlike most other top Republican officials, Trump generally does not couple his statements about Duke with a firm condemnation of Duke’s views. Instead, his answers are often reactive, such as “I would do that [repudiate Duke], if it made you feel better.”
    “There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.
    A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.
    Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”


    Hipkat, on *** other h***, is genuine, unapoli***tically nasty, and w**** his hea** on his ******. - jc856

  8. Rock on:

    junglesouljah (05-04-19)

  9. #18
    HipKat's Avatar
    Fah Q

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Mar 11, 2017
    Posts
    4,701
    Groan
    0
    Groans: 0
    Quote Originally Posted by Angry Byrds View Post
    Thank you for only answering part of the post, but again Sack didn’t title the article.
    No, but he used it to try and make a bullshit point
    “There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.
    A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.
    Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”


    Hipkat, on *** other h***, is genuine, unapoli***tically nasty, and w**** his hea** on his ******. - jc856

  10. #19
    Angry Byrds's Avatar
    Range Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 29, 2008
    Posts
    7,465
    Groan
    0
    Groans: 0
    Quote Originally Posted by HipKat View Post
    Donald Trump and David Duke: For the record

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.88d47cc72d2a

    Here is a full chronology of Donald Trump’s statements on white supremacist David Duke.

    Unlike most other top Republican officials, Trump generally does not couple his statements about Duke with a firm condemnation of Duke’s views. Instead, his answers are often reactive, such as “I would do that [repudiate Duke], if it made you feel better.”
    I guess Trump and Obama are like 2 peas in a pod.

  11. Rock on:

    HipKat (05-04-19),SackMan518 (05-04-19)

  12. #20
    Angry Byrds's Avatar
    Range Member

    Status
    Offline
    Join Date
    Feb 29, 2008
    Posts
    7,465
    Groan
    0
    Groans: 0
    Quote Originally Posted by HipKat View Post
    No, but he used it to try and make a bullshit point
    No you did, I was showing you that your point was bs

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •