PDA

View Full Version : My obsession for this week...


coastal
April 20th, 2006, 5:38:08 PM
Tatsui Latui

This guy is a football player, I'm telling ya. If we don't figure a way to trade down in the first and take this guy, I'm going to explode.

Drafting him and Whitworth in the second immediately gives our oline an identity.

The Deuce has hall-of-famer written all over him.

I'm gonna hang up and listen to your comments.

http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2006/writers/austin_murphy/01/03/murphys.law/t1_lutui.jpg

Merk
April 20th, 2006, 5:47:38 PM
I've liked him for awhile now


In Feb I didnt think he had a chance to be there for us in round 2 now I think he does along w/ C.Spencer who is another Mauler


The person I've Had my eye on for a couple weeks now and might be there when we pick in the 2nd is D'Qwell Jackson out of Maryland. He would be the perfect replacment for Fletch after this year. He could turn out to be a steal in the 2nd if we go O or D line in the first



http://www.collegefootballnews.com/photos/Maryland%20-%20DQwell%20JacksonH.gif

admarc
April 20th, 2006, 6:21:27 PM
I've been pretty consistently hoping for Ngata and Lutui for the Bills.

If that happens some wise young entrepenuer should open up a polynesian restaurant in downtown Buffalo. The two of them alone could keep the business profitable, unless of course they opt to put in an "all you can eat" buffet.

JayHall93
April 20th, 2006, 6:29:29 PM
I like Davin Joseph better at G

FknGvna
April 20th, 2006, 6:39:39 PM
Gilles, Joseph, Spencer, Deuce. Isn't that the order?

admarc
April 20th, 2006, 6:47:37 PM
Gilles, Joseph, Spencer, Deuce. Isn't that the order?

For what it's worth, I have it: Joseph, Deuce, Spencer, Gilles.

I doubt Joseph drops to the Bills 2nd rounder.

Merk
April 20th, 2006, 6:55:46 PM
For what it's worth, I have it: Joseph, Deuce, Spencer, Gilles.

I doubt Joseph drops to the Bills 2nd rounder.



Same here I think Joseph is the best guard on the board w/ Spencer and Lutui a virtual tie for 2nd and I really dont like Jean-Gilles anymore. I dont trust him to keep his weight in check

MVP
April 20th, 2006, 7:00:19 PM
I hope we can get Lutui also..
My Mock Draft Goes
1. Brodrick Bunkley
2. Taitusi Lutui
3. Daryn Colledge (Hoping he falls to us)

Besides D'brick i have Collede as my 2nd best pass protector.

1968_bills_fan
April 20th, 2006, 10:24:18 PM
I've been pretty consistently hoping for Ngata and Lutui for the Bills.

If that happens some wise young entrepenuer should open up a polynesian restaurant in downtown Buffalo. The two of them alone could keep the business profitable, unless of course they opt to put in an "all you can eat" buffet.
LOL

GvilleBill
April 20th, 2006, 10:53:43 PM
I hope we can get Lutui also..
My Mock Draft Goes
1. Brodrick Bunkley
2. Taitusi Lutui
3. Daryn Colledge (Hoping he falls to us)

Besides D'brick i have Collede as my 2nd best pass protector.
Yeah, I been thinking similar thoughts, with visions of safetys mixed in there.

sdolan11
April 21st, 2006, 4:10:34 PM
The person I've Had my eye on for a couple weeks now and might be there when we pick in the 2nd is D'Qwell Jackson out of Maryland. He would be the perfect replacment for Fletch after this year. He could turn out to be a steal in the 2nd if we go O or D line in the first



http://www.collegefootballnews.com/photos/Maryland%20-%20DQwell%20JacksonH.gif

Good call on D'Qwell . . .I think he's going to be an excellent pro. I just have doubts that he'll fall outside the first round.

jjm19672000
April 21st, 2006, 4:29:37 PM
Tatsui Latui

This guy is a football player, I'm telling ya. If we don't figure a way to trade down in the first and take this guy, I'm going to explode.

Drafting him and Whitworth in the second immediately gives our oline an identity.

The Deuce has hall-of-famer written all over him.

I'm gonna hang up and listen to your comments.

http://i.a.cnn.net/si/2006/writers/austin_murphy/01/03/murphys.law/t1_lutui.jpg

At what point do you want to address other areas of need?

coastal
April 21st, 2006, 9:58:37 PM
At what point do you want to address other areas of need?
3rd round of picks of Kyle Williams and any from the following group...

Gerris Wilkinson
Cedric Griffin
Alex Zemaitis
Greg Blue
Dusty Dvoracek
Jesse Mahelona

gunnar_zero
April 22nd, 2006, 9:31:09 AM
3rd round of picks of Kyle Williams and any from the following group...

Gerris Wilkinson
Cedric Griffin
Alex Zemaitis
Greg Blue
Dusty Dvoracek
Jesse Mahelona


I would accept the picks you mentioned, but you also forgot to suggest any compesation for trading down for Duece. We could trade down 18 spots and nab him, getting good value in it for us. So depending on what you did wit hthat, would make this a solid draft or not.

If we traded to 20-25th pick and took Duece (Which is still high for him in this DB draft I think) and nabbed another 2nd, then grabbed Whitworth, Donte Whitner if he falls, Kyle Williams and Dvoracek, that is a draft without any big names, but HUGE depth.

I really like Duece also, he is just kind of in that range that makes it hard for us to trade down, but also too high to trade up.

coastal
April 22nd, 2006, 9:37:15 AM
I would accept the picks you mentioned, but you also forgot to suggest any compesation for trading down for Duece. We could trade down 18 spots and nab him, getting good value in it for us. So depending on what you did wit hthat, would make this a solid draft or not.

If we traded to 20-25th pick and took Duece (Which is still high for him in this DB draft I think) and nabbed another 2nd, then grabbed Whitworth, Donte Whitner if he falls, Kyle Williams and Dvoracek, that is a draft without any big names, but HUGE depth.

I really like Duece also, he is just kind of in that range that makes it hard for us to trade down, but also too high to trade up.
Being able to dance with a trading partner like Minnesota and pick up their 48th or 51st pick overall is what I am looking for on draft day.

An extra second rounder to target a guy like Darryl Tapp, Tamba Hali, or Whitner would be the game plan.

Like you said...

No huge stars (except for Deuce) but huge in depth.