PDA

View Full Version : The enduring disgrace of Harry Schmidt


ticatfan3
April 11th, 2006, 3:29:14 PM
Published: Tuesday, April 11, 2006
According to Major Harry Schmidt, the U.S. Air Force has ruined his reputation. We would suggest that Maj. Schmidt has done a fine job of ruining it himself.

On April 17, 2002, Maj. Schmidt, an F-16 pilot, was cruising at 20,000 feet over Afghanistan when he observed fiery streaks below. Believing it to be anti-aircraft fire from Taliban forces, he sought permission to attack. Despite being explicitly told by flight control to "hold fire" -- and despite the fact that he was high enough to be effectively immune from ground fire -- Maj. Schmidt swooped in and dropped a 500-pound bomb.

His rogue act of "self-defence" was in fact an attack on Canadian troops performing a training exercise. The consequences were tragic. Four Canadians were killed, and eight others were injured.

Despite the staggering recklessness of Maj. Schmidt's actions -- other pilots told investigators they would simply have soared to a higher altitude and left the area -- it is his attitude since that has spoken worst of his character. Most people who killed four innocents would be ridden with guilt. Not so Maj. Schmidt, who apparently still sees himself as the primary victim.

Last year, he went on American national television to cast himself as a hero -- insisting that he "did the right thing under the circumstances with the information I was given." Now, rather than considering himself fortunate to have had four counts of negligent manslaughter and eight counts of aggravated assault reduced to a single court-martial for dereliction of duty, Maj. Schmidt is suing the U.S. Air Force for releasing the reprimand he received for the bombing.

Maj. Schmidt is a remorseless, despicable character. No matter how far he is prepared to take his grievance in court, the U.S. military should not give an inch. To surrender to his childish moral vanity would be an insult to the memories of the Canadian soldiers who died by his hand.

© National Post 2006

nehemiah
April 11th, 2006, 3:48:01 PM
someone needs to write a bot that posts :link: every time you start a thread.

oy vey. :banghead:

:rofl:

ticatfan3
April 11th, 2006, 3:54:09 PM
someone needs to write a bot that posts :link: every time you start a thread.

oy vey. :banghead:

:rofl:Why?

nehemiah
April 11th, 2006, 4:02:16 PM
Why?from TOS: 5) No posting of entire articles/copyrighted material. Posts containing news stories/article segments must also include author’s name, name of the publication or source, and the URL where the story was found.
http://www.buffalorange.com/showthread.php?t=62809

ticatfan3
April 11th, 2006, 4:10:24 PM
from TOS: 5) No posting of entire articles/copyrighted material. Posts containing news stories/article segments must also include author’s name, name of the publication or source, and the URL where the story was found.
http://www.buffalorange.com/showthread.php?t=62809So I had the name and the newspaper and that is not good enough for you?

nehemiah
April 11th, 2006, 4:14:57 PM
how difficult is it to post the link after you post the article?

we like to read the original article - which we can't find without a link.

ckg68
April 11th, 2006, 10:53:06 PM
I mean,for God's sake,ticat...even I post links. Sometimes,even a teaser paragraph.but the link to the full piece is there too.

Granted,I get links wrong(which see,the AT&T lawsuit)...but at least I'll point you in the right direction.

ticatfan3
April 12th, 2006, 8:54:28 AM
I will for now on lads.

jjm19672000
April 12th, 2006, 2:59:26 PM
At any rate, having been in the air force for 21 years, 1 month, and 7 days, I can tell you that they will go to great lenghts to protect their officers.

ticatfan3
April 12th, 2006, 3:26:28 PM
At any rate, having been in the air force for 21 years, 1 month, and 7 days, I can tell you that they will go to great lenghts to protect their officers.Well he is in denial.