View Full Version : Sign Rocky Bernard
BillsCAfan
March 2nd, 2006, 5:32:09 PM
He's young, he's lethal, and has yet to reach his peak.
Way better option than Ngata
He reminds me of a young and upcoming Warren Sapp (during his prime)
Poz51
March 2nd, 2006, 5:41:35 PM
I've been saying for a week sign Bernard, trade back in the 1st round and acquire another #2 or 3 pick this year, and draft Broderick Bunkley. Two smaller, quicker, and more agile DTs in the middle in Bernard and Bunkley is what would make our DL a force again.
Might
March 2nd, 2006, 5:48:36 PM
He's young, he's lethal, and has yet to reach his peak.
Way better option than Ngata
He reminds me of a young and upcoming Warren Sapp (during his prime)
I agree.
Though Ngata will be better, I think getting Bernard and drafting someone like Vernon Davis, AJ Hawk, or Michael Huff will be the best option.
BillsCAfan
March 2nd, 2006, 5:52:22 PM
I agree.
Though Ngata will be better, I think getting Bernard and drafting someone like Vernon Davis, AJ Hawk, or Michael Huff will be the best option.
I don't even thing Ngata will be better.
I mean, look at what Bernard did this past year.
50+ tackles and 9 sacks and he's only 26 into his 5th year.
He's gonna be a monster for the next 5 years.
BeastMode Deep
March 2nd, 2006, 5:54:07 PM
Sounds good to me, I want us to make a splash in FA'cy so we dont have to draft out of necessity
emo
March 2nd, 2006, 5:57:40 PM
what i wonder about though is that if you find a guy who has teh same build as ron edwards how is he going to handle guards?
unlike what answer believes edwards was a huge detriment to run defense, and with fletcher being so small I would think that the bills would need bigger more athletic dt's in the stroud henderson mold
I don't know if that guy exists in this draft or in free agency
I dont know the answer to this question, I dont' think you can answer it until you see what happens on the field
but tank johnson and tommie harris are only around 300
Mouldsie
March 2nd, 2006, 6:01:31 PM
ron edwards was trying to do pat wiliams' job thats why
emo
March 2nd, 2006, 6:04:35 PM
ron edwards was trying to do pat wiliams' job thats why
so if edwards and adams had switched roles things would have been fine?
FknGvna
March 2nd, 2006, 6:09:30 PM
[QUOTE=DreReedFan83]Two smaller, quicker, and more agile DTs in the middle [QUOTE]
I am getting sick and tired of hearing this. Name an effective team with a weak interior. Strong interiors are, Stroud and Henderson, Wilfork and Seymour Sapp and Ted., etc...
Bills TDs->:box: <-any OG.
FknGvna
March 2nd, 2006, 6:49:20 PM
[QUOTE=DreReedFan83]Two smaller, quicker, and more agile DTs in the middle QUOTE]
I am getting sick and tired of hearing this. Name an effective team with a weak interior. Strong interiors are, Stroud and Henderson, Wilfork and Seymour, Sapp and Ted., etc...Hell even Rogers and Wilkerson sounds nice.
Bills DTs->:box: <-any OG.
Mouldsie
March 2nd, 2006, 6:59:05 PM
if we were running a cover 2 defense with better personnel things would have been fine.... edwards is a penetrator and our DL's job in grey's defense was to occupy people to let the blitz get through. adams' attitude never helped either
The U
March 2nd, 2006, 8:38:31 PM
I'd Love Bunkley and Bernard
1968_bills_fan
March 3rd, 2006, 10:27:05 PM
I'd Love Bunkley and Bernard
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.