PDA

View Full Version : What We Really Need to Draft For..


The U
February 25th, 2006, 10:18:38 PM
We don't need to draft for mutch but everyone keeps coming up with all new ways to waste picks like...

A TE- WTF do we need another one for? Everett will contribute heavily this year and Campbell is a decent blocking TE who can catch and Euhus is an athletic guy who can also block... I'd stick with those three and no one else.

Another QB- Again WTF do we need to draft / bring in another guy for? We need to protect the 2 that we have! Losman never had a decent chance and I feel will show what he's made out of in T.C. / P.S. and through out the year.

I think if we STAY AWAY from drafting those positions and drafting these positions....

Tackle- We need an athletic guy who can pair with Peters and help our QB's.

Guard- We need someone to go along with Villarial to help bolster our line.

D-Tackle- Need a quick, yet strong guy who can get up field and stay in his gap and maybe take a double team.

D-End- We need a pass rusher who can get up field and reak havoc in the backfield.

Safety- Need a SS who can pair with Baker in years to come, cause it will never be Wire.

Wide Reciever- if Moulds is let go then we need to take a possesion reciever with one of our 3rd rounders, nothing higher!

We'll be alright.

SHINEdown30
February 25th, 2006, 11:06:24 PM
We don't need to draft for mutch but everyone keeps coming up with all new ways to waste picks like...

A TE- WTF do we need another one for? Everett will contribute heavily this year and Campbell is a decent blocking TE who can catch and Euhus is an athletic guy who can also block... I'd stick with those three and no one else.

Another QB- Again WTF do we need to draft / bring in another guy for? We need to protect the 2 that we have! Losman never had a decent chance and I feel will show what he's made out of in T.C. / P.S. and through out the year.

I think if we STAY AWAY from drafting those positions and drafting these positions....

Tackle- We need an athletic guy who can pair with Peters and help our QB's.

Guard- We need someone to go along with Villarial to help bolster our line.

D-Tackle- Need a quick, yet strong guy who can get up field and stay in his gap and maybe take a double team.

D-End- We need a pass rusher who can get up field and reak havoc in the backfield.

Safety- Need a SS who can pair with Baker in years to come, cause it will never be Wire.

Wide Reciever- if Moulds is let go then we need to take a possesion reciever with one of our 3rd rounders, nothing higher!

We'll be alright.


lol.......enough said. i love ur take on wideouts 3rd rounder for a 2nd stringer!(because your boy roscoe will not become a number 2 wide out hes way to small) also you dont even have gandy starting which is one of your problems and i dont even want to comment on the rest. You think ever rookie we draft is going to make an impact and they are not going to!! All this is ramble!!!

The U
February 25th, 2006, 11:24:24 PM
lol.......enough said. i love ur take on wideouts 3rd rounder for a 2nd stringer!(because your boy roscoe will not become a number 2 wide out hes way to small) also you dont even have gandy starting which is one of your problems and i dont even want to comment on the rest. You think ever rookie we draft is going to make an impact and they are not going to!! All this is ramble!!!
Sco can play #2, size don't mean a thing. The Third Rounder can be a #3 guy with Sco and Lee on the outside giving the #3 guy space to run. Gandy sucks, were supposed to be upgrading the line not letting washups like Gandy and Anderson start. Draft a coulple of o-lineman let them play together for a while so we will have a line together for years to come.

SHINEdown30
February 25th, 2006, 11:31:00 PM
Sco can play #2, size don't mean a thing. The Third Rounder can be a #3 guy with Sco and Lee on the outside giving the #3 guy space to run. Gandy sucks, were supposed to be upgrading the line not letting washups like Gandy and Anderson start. Draft a coulple of o-lineman let them play together for a while so we will have a line together for years to come.

are you serious kid!!Sco is 5'9" and about 165 pounds soaking wet! Size dont mean a thing, all the CB is going to do is press him at the line. And gandy is probably the 2nd best o-line man we have. you cant have 3 rookies start and expect them to have results, our line will be worse than it was last year! Have them play together for a while, :rolleyes2 (they will only have training camp and preseason and thats not alot of time to have team chemistry. Most o-lines in the league have been playing for years and you expect our line to be good with 2 rookies and 2 1-year veterns(if preston is center). You are eithier real young or on crack!

The U
February 25th, 2006, 11:49:55 PM
Never said all the rookies we draft had to play, if we pick other ones in free agency our line would be fine. We need to draft / get a FA for LG and RT. Once we move Peters to the Left Tackle spot, Preston in the middle, and Villarial at right guard. Playing in T.C. / P.S is enough to learn to play with each other! Our line was fine in Week 1 but at the begining of the Tampa game Ronde Barber fell on Fat Ass Mikes ankle and our line went down from there! Sco is 5'9 170 and it is tough to jam him because his agility is tops in the league neither Moss or Smith have the agility of Roscoe. Moss is not even close to as aggressive as Roscoe. Sco will be perfectly fine at the #2 spot. He will make plays both on special teams and on offense for the rest of his career.

SHINEdown30
February 26th, 2006, 12:00:12 AM
Never said all the rookies we draft had to play, if we pick other ones in free agency our line would be fine. We need to draft / get a FA for LG and RT. Once we move Peters to the Left Tackle spot, Preston in the middle, and Villarial at right guard. Playing in T.C. / P.S is enough to learn to play with each other! Our line was fine in Week 1 but at the begining of the Tampa game Ronde Barber fell on Fat Ass Mikes ankle and our line went down from there! Sco is 5'9 170 and it is tough to jam him because his agility is tops in the league neither Moss or Smith have the agility of Roscoe. Moss is not even close to as aggressive as Roscoe. Sco will be perfectly fine at the #2 spot. He will make plays both on special teams and on offense for the rest of his career.

lol.....t.c and p.s. enough to learn to play with each other. So very wrong, you never played a team sports have you(outside of little league) because you would know it takes some time to build good team chemistry. And ronde barber did us a favor for doing that to mike williams(hes finally gone) and dont tell me your even comparing moss or smith to parrish:nono: . Moss is not as aggressive as roscoe.....are you serious. roscoe hasn't even played a full game with being on the field more than 10 times. Moss and smith are great recievers that can beat you with their speed or their route running, roscoe will be nothing more than a 3rd wideout or a special teams player. Get out of roscoe's pants and come to reality. He would be pummled by good cornerback or saftey. For roscoes sake i hope we dont play the redskins cause sean taylor would have a field day on him! By the way how old are you?

The U
February 26th, 2006, 12:03:35 AM
lol.....t.c and p.s. enough to learn to play with each other. So very wrong, you never played a team sports have you(outside of little league) because you would know it takes some time to build good team chemistry. And ronde barber did us a favor for doing that to mike williams(hes finally gone) and dont tell me your even comparing moss or smith to parrish:nono: . Moss is not as aggressive as roscoe.....are you serious. roscoe hasn't even played a full game with being on the field more than 10 times. Moss and smith are great recievers that can beat you with their speed or their route running, roscoe will be nothing more than a 3rd wideout or a special teams player. Get out of roscoe's pants and come to reality. He would be pummled by good cornerback or saftey. For roscoes sake i hope we dont play the redskins cause sean taylor would have a field day on day!
1. Sean Taylor is a Safety.. Get it Strait.
2. Sco has played more than 10 downs plenty of times.. Get it Strait
3. Field day on day.. Get out of Pre-K my Friend.

kdhammond
February 26th, 2006, 7:43:15 AM
I generally agree with SCO11's assessment here. We need OL and DTs desperately. Unfortunately, it is also a bad draft policy to "reach" to fill positions of need when there are better players at other positions available. Donahoe got crucified for taking the best players available, but I think we'll see some of those guys contribute this year in Parrish and Everett.

All things being equal, I'd love to see the Bills be able to have the best player available line up with their needs. It looks like they may get lucky and have Ngata there at #8 and his combine showing confirms that he is in shape. That would fill a major need.

However, if Mario Williams, Ngata and Ferguson are all gone by #8, they either need to try to trade down for an extra 2 or 3 and hope that one of the next OL or DL line up with their new slot or consider the best players available at #8 at positions of lesser need like S - Huff and TE Vernon Davis.

Just my $.02 worth.

TheAnswer74
February 26th, 2006, 7:55:43 AM
We need OG's and a C on offense. On Defense, we need 2 quick DT's and a pass rushing LE.

People need to stop looking at Roscoe Parrish height and weight. No one can bump this guy on the line. Its like trying to bump and run a turkey, you wont even touch the guy, hes too quick.

Most DB's will play off of Sco because he runs 4.38 and is even quicker than fast. Trying to bump him would be very dumb.

One thing about the Rams system, they always had smallish but fast WR's.

SHINEdown30
February 26th, 2006, 8:51:17 AM
1. Sean Taylor is a Safety.. Get it Strait.
2. Sco has played more than 10 downs plenty of times.. Get it Strait
3. Field day on day.. Get out of Pre-K my Friend.

first off strait is an passage way or a canal so get it STRAIGHT
i know sean taylor is a safety...i clearly said "He would be pummled by good cornerback or safety". so get it straight
and sco11-RECEIVING
G GS No Yards Avg Lg TD 20+ 40+ FD
10 1 15 148 9.9 28 1 1 0 7
those are good stats.



and theanswer74......a physical db would hit roscoe as soon as they called hike and parrish would be knocked back. I was glad we drafted a smaller faster wideout last year but as a number 3 wideout. Parrish can do wonders in the middle of the field especially cause it will sometimes take the safety to cover him. But he is no number 2 wide receiver.

TheAnswer74
February 26th, 2006, 9:07:14 AM
and theanswer74......a physical db would hit roscoe as soon as they called hike and parrish would be knocked back. I know parrish is fast but he is not capable of being our number 2 go guy.

A physical DB would get left in his dust if he tried to Bump Sco.

It sounds easy, but there arent many physical CB's that run 4.3 and are as quick as Sco. The Bills have a couple, but not many teams do.

If it was that easy, Marvin Harrison would never get off the line. Comming into the NFL, Harrison was about 6'0 165 lbs.

I promise you, most CB's will not be able to bump Sco and most wont even attempt to.

Roscoe Parrish can play ball, he has heart. People need to forget about his size, hes a baller. Hes the type of guy and player this city will love in future.

SHINEdown30
February 26th, 2006, 11:24:08 AM
A physical DB would get left in his dust if he tried to Bump Sco.

It sounds easy, but there arent many physical CB's that run 4.3 and are as quick as Sco. The Bills have a couple, but not many teams do.

If it was that easy, Marvin Harrison would never get off the line. Comming into the NFL, Harrison was about 6'0 165 lbs.

I promise you, most CB's will not be able to bump Sco and most wont even attempt to.

Roscoe Parrish can play ball, he has heart. People need to forget about his size, hes a baller. Hes the type of guy and player this city will love in future.


any cb can bump parrish on the line and if he gets the cb gets beat the safety is there to help. We did it against steve smith this year!!!and your telling me you want roscoe parrish as our number 2 wide receiver this year?

1968_bills_fan
February 26th, 2006, 3:54:13 PM
If we don't get Mario or Fergabsib at #8, then trade down and get TWO great starters (or rookie crapshoots at starters). We then have 1 1st round, 2 2nd rounds and 2 3rd rounds.

With the first two picks go for{DT and OT (if da #2 OT is there- if not then OG}

then {OL and DE and LB/or/CB). Do another OL from FA (and pay big $$) and we have a foundation starting.

TheAnswer74
February 26th, 2006, 9:12:00 PM
any cb can bump parrish on the line and if he gets the cb gets beat the safety is there to help. We did it against steve smith this year!!!and your telling me you want roscoe parrish as our number 2 wide receiver this year?


Like I said, not many CB's in the league are as physical and fast as the Bills.

Plus, if your using Steve Smith as an example you should think again.

I always saw Parrish as a slot WR, but for someone to say he isnt big enought to get off the line, they really dont know what they are talking about.

WR's use speed and quickness, even the biggest and strongest ones like TO, to get off the line. If you let the DB get his hands on you, you might as well not even run your route.