PDA

View Full Version : Spiked : Cap analysis

Alternity
January 20th, 2005, 1:15:31 PM
Hey Spiked (or anybody else) you seem to be pretty knowledgable about the salary cap and to enjoy looking into these kind of things. Would it be possible to have an analysis or where we stand cap-wise as well as the salary status of a few important players?
Alternity
January 20th, 2005, 1:16:20 PM
Damn... wanted to post this in the main forum...

Any way a mod could move it there please?
SpikedLemonade
January 20th, 2005, 1:21:46 PM
Now that is a very BIG project.

I will see if I can find an updated analysis by someone else that looks accurate.
ddaryl
January 20th, 2005, 2:30:31 PM
Bills salary cap page (http://www.*********.com/mtlog/archives/2004/12/29/*********s_2005_buffalo_bills_salary_cap_page.php)


best link for Bills cap info on the net
mighty peace warrior
January 20th, 2005, 2:34:39 PM
your link doesnt work, and i will move this
ddaryl
January 20th, 2005, 3:25:49 PM
The link does not work because it goes to another Bills fan website.

http://www.*********.com/mtlog/archives/2004/12/29/*********s_2005_buffalo_bills_salary_cap_page.php

just insert bills zone (one word no space in place of the ****)


I never understood this premadonna mentality
dognipples69
January 20th, 2005, 3:32:12 PM
wow were 8 million under and have no dead cap (only 875000)
Alternity
January 20th, 2005, 4:22:42 PM
Thanks that's exactly what I was looking for.
ddaryl
January 20th, 2005, 6:53:53 PM
Now add in a few key player cuts which will save us close to 2 million like Prelieaou.

Then figure Moulds's restructure and extension will widdle his 8.5 million cap # down to 3.5 million which saves us another 5 million.

Then add in our rookie salary pool # which does not include a #1 pick or a #5 pick this year.

This is all projection but the Bills are in rock solid shape for FA shopping, and we could very well be 10 - 12 million under.

Sign Big Pat, and upgrade our OT and OG positions.
г
January 20th, 2005, 7:17:45 PM
The link does not work because it goes to another Bills fan website.

http://www.*********.com/mtlog/archives/2004/12/29/*********s_2005_buffalo_bills_salary_cap_page.php

just insert bills zone (one word no space in place of the ****)


I never understood this premadonna mentality

http://www.beckerfilms.com/JackNicholson.gif

LOL, you can't handle the truth
SweetLee8 3PlayaWha?
January 20th, 2005, 9:09:50 PM
Don't forget that we save 2.2 million by cutting Bledsoe. We are in fine cap shape. When you consider that most contracts escalate the most in year 2, it's reasonable to eat the 4.3 million for Bledsoe now as opposed to spreading it. Don't get confused and assume that means it hurts our cap. It just means that we only save 2.2 million by cutting him compared to what it would cost to keep him.
TheAnswer74
January 20th, 2005, 9:15:02 PM
Most teams are in great shape for Free agent shopping. Most Teams have learned how to manage their cap.
SweetLee8 3PlayaWha?
January 20th, 2005, 10:18:46 PM
Most teams are in great shape for Free agent shopping. Most Teams have learned how to manage their cap.

True.
zanthrax54
January 20th, 2005, 10:55:05 PM
Most teams are in great shape for Free agent shopping. Most Teams have learned how to manage their cap.


that's ok though, we really only need a few hogs on the line, either side...
Magus39
January 21st, 2005, 12:50:02 AM
Most teams are in great shape for Free agent shopping. Most Teams have learned how to manage their cap.
Im not so sure about the 'Skins though.
SpikedLemonade
January 21st, 2005, 7:51:16 AM
Most teams are in great shape for Free agent shopping. Most Teams have learned how to manage their cap.

Exactly.

That is why there are NO more bargains available in FA and in fact, FA players more often than NOT receive more money then they are worth due to the competition for their services.
obie wan
January 21st, 2005, 9:28:26 AM
Exactly.

That is why there are NO more bargains available in FA and in fact, FA players more often than NOT receive more money then they are worth due to the competition for their services.

Exactly - probably the reason Teflon Tom felt compelled to "cut" Drew's pay down to $8.75 mil.

Looks like MM may have earned himself enough clout to finally force TD to correct the QB situation by cuttin our losses with our Hall of Fame QB. :fishfry:
SpikedLemonade
January 21st, 2005, 9:40:50 AM
Exactly - probably the reason Teflon Tom felt compelled to "cut" Drew's pay down to $8.75 mil.

Looks like MM may have earned himself enough clout to finally force TD to correct the QB situation by cuttin our losses with our Hall of Fame QB. :fishfry:

Obie where have you been? :lastyear:

Did you see they created a special forum for me -- "Bledsoe vs. Losman..."? :D

Good people here! :worship:
obie wan
January 25th, 2005, 8:35:59 AM
Obie where have you been? :lastyear:

Did you see they created a special forum for me -- "Bledsoe vs. Losman..."? :D

Good people here! :worship:

that's quite an honor.

However, I think its an attempt to quarantine the Drew apologists in one place.
35Pete
January 25th, 2005, 8:38:25 AM
Looks like MM may have earned himself enough clout to finally force TD to correct the QB situation by cuttin our losses with our Hall of Fame QB. :fishfry:

:rofl: Good one!
BillsRGreat
January 25th, 2005, 11:01:51 AM
that's quite an honor.

However, I think its an attempt to quarantine the Drew apologists in one place.

I look at it more of a place to quarantine those who feel they need to bash the guy even though most of us already know he's done, and don't feel like reading about him every five minutes...

Cause really.. it gets old... Theres 51 other players on the team... we know one's done... (either cut or pay cut)