PDA

View Full Version : why didnt we choose Bryant Mckinnie


CJBS
March 28th, 2004, 5:55:57 PM
how well has Mike williams panned out for us and would it have been better to take Mckinnie instead

gilchristfan
March 28th, 2004, 6:22:28 PM
I would have taken Mckinnie first too, but they are both in their 2nd year, so its doubtful either has come close to maturing.

BTW, if you don't think MW has panned out, why do you think McKinnie has? I mean the guy gave up like 10 sacks this year and was also flagged for holding several times. With Jennings on the LT spot, I don't know if that's an area where we are deficient. Had McKinnie been playing there last year, it might have been a step backwards from what we have in that spot.

BTKMTG
March 28th, 2004, 7:09:06 PM
I have a friend at work who is a Minnesota fan, and they are saying the same things about McKinnie we are saying abut Williams... They are only entering their 3rd years... Be patient... This should be the deciding year ???

buffmaniac
March 28th, 2004, 7:13:09 PM
McNally should be a big plus in the development in Mike.

nATEFan22
March 28th, 2004, 7:54:56 PM
I remember that draft year and on the best damn sports show he said he def does not want to go to buffalo i think thats why

CJBS
March 28th, 2004, 11:10:25 PM
didnt know the stats he had thats why I possed the question to see if one was better than the other, also mckinnie had sat out most of year one.