Rose To Be Let In

[kfman87]

The jury in the Pete Rose mock trial ruled in favor of Rose, 8-4. What do you guys think? Read about more here: http://espn.go.com/mlb/s/2003/0717/1582288.html

[Hurls]

I think based on stats alone, hands down he belongs. Some of that trial was actually pretty funny

[FrankieA]

If you keep murderers, wife beaters and other felons in or keep them in why not Pete, I say yes. The integrity (sp?) of the game is not higher on the list then the well being of others.

[Hurls]

Is OJ still in the Hall of Fame? I remember there was a debate about it, but cant recall what happened

[PUCKER]

I say yes. He has the stats,great career...

[D-Rocafella]

His stats are good enough to get in so he should be in. He never cheated to get any of his numbers he earned them just like he earns a spot in the hall of fame.

[John]

I voted no. By no, I mean not now.

Eventually, Rose will be in the Hall. Why now? The guy bet on baseball and knew the rules and consequenses. Then he denied it until backed into a corner and then agreed to the lifetime ban.

I guess it wouldn't trouble me too much if he gets inducted when he's not around to see it.

[ticatfan3]

If rose does not get in ,then by no way should that cheating sosa get in.