Mr.Chimp
February 4th, 2003, 1:27:48 AM
I want to be as simple as i can. I want to question the current US administrations logic towards Iraq.
Bush, labeled Iraq as the not too honorable member from the axis of evil. Further, he has stated that for the past 11 years has Saddam been playing games. Bush on many occasions has called saddam an evil man, who is hiding weapons of mass destruction and purposefully concealing damning evidence of them.
The endgame that saddam seeks, according to president Bush, is to threaten the free world. Bush's endgame is security for the american people and the world.
Bush links Saddam to evil. Evil, will do it all it can to dominate and survive. Evil will also cause you to be deceptive, hence the accusation that Saddam is concealing WMD's and evidence of them.
Now, for example lets say Saddam is evil and is everything Bush accuses him of being, moreover he is hiding WMD's while involved in a campaign to mislead the UN inspectors and the world as to their whereabouts.
Assuming that Saddam will use his WMD's during an invasion is inherent to belief that an evil man will do all he can to survive.
The bottom line is that the logic doesnt make sense. If The purpose to Bush, is to give american people and the world security then what better way to get Saddam to use his WMD's then to invade his country with an army stricken with the intent of toppling the regime no matter what.
Then the Bush administration will prove to the world two things, that Saddam was actively involved in a conspiracy to hide WMD's and that Saddam was willing to use them (after Saddam has used WMD's on coalition soldiers and iraqi civilians in his last ditch attempt to survive).
Why would Bush want to prove the latter?
Bush, labeled Iraq as the not too honorable member from the axis of evil. Further, he has stated that for the past 11 years has Saddam been playing games. Bush on many occasions has called saddam an evil man, who is hiding weapons of mass destruction and purposefully concealing damning evidence of them.
The endgame that saddam seeks, according to president Bush, is to threaten the free world. Bush's endgame is security for the american people and the world.
Bush links Saddam to evil. Evil, will do it all it can to dominate and survive. Evil will also cause you to be deceptive, hence the accusation that Saddam is concealing WMD's and evidence of them.
Now, for example lets say Saddam is evil and is everything Bush accuses him of being, moreover he is hiding WMD's while involved in a campaign to mislead the UN inspectors and the world as to their whereabouts.
Assuming that Saddam will use his WMD's during an invasion is inherent to belief that an evil man will do all he can to survive.
The bottom line is that the logic doesnt make sense. If The purpose to Bush, is to give american people and the world security then what better way to get Saddam to use his WMD's then to invade his country with an army stricken with the intent of toppling the regime no matter what.
Then the Bush administration will prove to the world two things, that Saddam was actively involved in a conspiracy to hide WMD's and that Saddam was willing to use them (after Saddam has used WMD's on coalition soldiers and iraqi civilians in his last ditch attempt to survive).
Why would Bush want to prove the latter?