PDA

View Full Version : Democrat Donors want their money back


Merc
March 16th, 2008, 12:24:29 PM
Back when the DNC announced Howard Dean as their leader I thought "How can it get any better for us, a nut is now in charge of the asylum." Of course, only republicans can screw up such a good thing and they have but Dean's leadership, or lack thereof, is finally bearing fruit. You can play the race card and hit each other over the head with a baseball bat at polling places but when donations stop, or worse yet, when heavy duty donors ask for their money back, you have a very big problem.

http://tinyurl.com/3dkeja

NY Times
March 15, 2008
Delegate Battles Snarl Democrats in Two States
By MICHAEL LUO and JOHN M. BRODER

The situation in Florida seemed more intractable, with Clinton supporters arguing the party’s prospects in November could be jeopardized if a satisfactory resolution is not found. Some Clinton backers said they were intentionally withholding their contributions to the party, arguing that Howard Dean, the D.N.C.’s chairman, has left the situation in the hands of the states and the candidates, as opposed to exercising leadership to resolve it.

“My wife and I could max out, and we won’t,” said Ira Leesfield, a Miami lawyer who has given $61,500 to the committee since 1997. “We’re dissatisfied with the D.N.C. not taking the bull by the horns.”

About 250 top fund-raisers for Mrs. Clinton met Wednesday in Washington. Terry McAuliffe, the Clinton campaign’s chairman and a former chairman of the Democratic National Committee, encouraged the donors to pick up the phone and call party leaders, as did Mrs. Clinton.

But Mr. McAuliffe said in an interview Friday that he did not approve of donors’ holding back their contributions to the D.N.C.

A review of records filed with the Federal Election Commission shows that top donors to the committee gave more to Mrs. Clinton than to Mr. Obama. Of 196 people who have given at least $30,000 to the D.N.C. since 2005, it appears 71 of them contributed to Mrs. Clinton, with donations totaling more than $295,000, while 67 gave to Mr. Obama for about $189,000. And 25 gave to both.

Stacie Paxton, a spokeswoman for the D.N.C., defended Mr. Dean’s handling of the dispute.

“While Howard Dean has been working hard to be an honest broker, too many involved have been more concerned with headlines than results,” Ms. Paxton said. “It’s never productive to negotiate through the press, but make no mistake, Howard Dean will continue to lead the effort to find a workable solution that’s fair and consistent with the rules.”

Griff Palmer contributed reporting from New York, and Abby Goodnough from Tallahassee, Fla.

Hillary is more than willing to bring the party to its knees, even if it means losing the election. Chaos is the Clinton's forte and power vacuums their opportunity. They'll be running the DNC come January if the dems lose the general election.

JLB
March 16th, 2008, 12:33:53 PM
it's fun just watching the patients run around into things. :guy:

JLB
March 16th, 2008, 3:11:59 PM
Back when the DNC announced Howard Dean as their leader I thought "How can it get any better for us, a nut is now in charge of e asylum." Of course only republicans can screw up such a good thing but Dean's leadership, or lack thereof, is finally bearing fruit. You can play the race card and hit each other over the head with a baseball bat at polling places but when donations stop, or worse yet, when heavy duty donors ask for their money back, you have a very big problem.

http://tinyurl.com/3dkeja

[I]NY Times
March 15, 2008
Delegate Battles Snarl Democrats in Two States
By MICHAEL LUO and JOHN M. BRODER

About 250 top fund-raisers for Mrs. Clinton met Wednesday in Washington. Terry McAuliffe, the Clinton campaign’s chairman and a former chairman of the Democratic National Committee, encouraged the donors to pick up the phone and call party leaders, as did Mrs. Clinton.

Hillary is more than willing to bring the party to its knees, even if it means losing the election. Chaos is the Clinton's forte and power vacuums their opportunity. They'll be running the DNC come January if the dems lose the general election.


Interesting article!

nehemiah
March 16th, 2008, 9:23:09 PM
"democrat" donors? :rofl:

another republican hack. awesome.


so how did the democ'rats do in the midterms?

keep bashing howard dean b/c he is kicking republican ass.

and the democ'rats will continue to kick your pitiful party's collective and individual ass(es).

get used to the wilderness, republicans... for you shall be spending the next 50 years out there.

Merc
March 16th, 2008, 10:26:02 PM
Your newpaper nehe, not mine. I'm just linking it. Send your grievances their way if you don't like the news.

nehemiah
March 16th, 2008, 10:48:57 PM
Your newpaper nehe, not mine. I'm just linking it. Send your grievances their way if you don't like the news."democrat donors" was from where to the what now?

:dunno:

Merc
March 16th, 2008, 11:54:22 PM
Reads the article! Big Miami money that wants their vote to count. Read the NYT's article for Gods sake, why are you asking me. I posted a link to a paper that is solidly on your approved reading list and you still argue with me. It is the NY Times, about as left as you can get and you are hammering me for the link. Man, is there anything I can link to that the demo SS won't try and censor?

Man oh man, I posted a dridge link to a Salon.com article and nehe slams me about the Drudge link. Now I post a direct link to the NY Times to appease the lefties and i still get slammed. The leftie world is very Orwellian.

"Yes citizen Merc, that is an approved paper but the dialogue is not approved state speak. The writer has been sent away and you should have known that if you were a good citizen of the left."

"But nehe, I posted when the writer was approved by Big Brother! And the NY Tiimes is Big Brothers favorite paper."

"Sorry, off to the Gulag with you."

JLB
March 18th, 2008, 11:13:05 AM
"democrat donors" was from where to the what now?

:dunno:

LOVE THIS LITTLE GUY "sorry". :D :dunno:

nehemiah
March 18th, 2008, 11:15:06 AM
not "democratic" donors... but "democrat" donors?

:dunno:

i didn't see that in the original article. maybe i missed it, though?

eyedog
March 18th, 2008, 11:54:49 AM
Dean, Kerry, Hillary, YYEEEEAAAWWWW !