View Full Version : Conservation of momentum
shiva2999
February 7th, 2008, 11:04:05 PM
According to the logic of the WTC1&2 collapses, this guy should just plow through these cardboard boxes with no appreciable resistance and splatter his dumb ass into a million pieces.
And yet he doesn't.
Why is that?
Maybe because the boxes weren't cut where no one could see?
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Bi_DqlmLpU4&rel=1"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Bi_DqlmLpU4&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>
shiva2999
February 8th, 2008, 1:22:09 PM
Gee, no bites from the "heavy thing falling causes total destruction, concrete pulverization, molten metal and earthquakes" crowd?
Where's Frank Greening when you need him?
Green Lantern
February 8th, 2008, 2:59:43 PM
Damn. I thought this thread was about how to lose a majority in the House despite your opponents revealing their stupidity by installing Pelosi in leadership.
That would be a good thread.
Gilly
February 8th, 2008, 3:19:16 PM
that was one ballsy jump thats for dang sure...
as for momentum stuff, i bet 20 floors of wtc weight would flatten whatever was below it pretty quick..
shiva2999
February 8th, 2008, 3:26:40 PM
that was one ballsy jump thats for dang sure...
as for momentum stuff, i bet 20 floors of wtc weight would flatten whatever was below it pretty quick..
Why would 20 floors ot wtc weight flatten 80 floors of uncompromised structure?
Ru
February 8th, 2008, 3:59:16 PM
Why would 20 floors ot wtc weight flatten 80 floors of uncompromised structure?
Cause this is 9/11 Land where the laws of physics no longer apply.
Gilly
February 8th, 2008, 4:02:20 PM
Why would 20 floors ot wtc weight flatten 80 floors of uncompromised structure?
that the million dollar question and the difference between us, its alot of weight and momentum moving in a way the building wasnt designed for, could it go straight down? maybe, its how it looked to me on tv.
should it have fallen off the side? thats what the evidence seems to tell you all.
we have a difference of opinion here, and since we will not change each others mind i ll just leave it as that.
shiva2999
February 8th, 2008, 6:49:22 PM
that the million dollar question and the difference between us, its alot of weight and momentum moving in a way the building wasnt designed for, could it go straight down? maybe, its how it looked to me on tv.
should it have fallen off the side? thats what the evidence seems to tell you all.
we have a difference of opinion here, and since we will not change each others mind i ll just leave it as that.
That's fine as long as you understand the point I've tried to make with this thread and the Criss Angel thread.
Sometimes what you see, what you think you see and what's really going on are three distinct things.
Sometimes our senses aren't enough.
35Pete
February 8th, 2008, 6:59:48 PM
that was one ballsy jump thats for dang sure...
as for momentum stuff, i bet 20 floors of wtc weight would flatten whatever was below it pretty quick..
Unless the 80 floors below it were NOT of the weight and strength of the 20 floors above it.
LOL
No. LMAO.
No. ROFLMFAO.
No. :rofl:
Too easy.
Green Lantern
February 8th, 2008, 7:04:49 PM
If you threw a box at that pile of boxes, what do you think would happen?
sukie
February 10th, 2008, 10:38:55 AM
what happens when a tall house of cards is constructed and you drop 30 additional floors worth of cards onto it from one card length in height? Static load vs dynamic load.
35Pete
February 10th, 2008, 12:25:37 PM
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y241/35Pete/conserv_momentum.jpg
q is number of inelastic collision, k is the index for the summation.
uppy
February 10th, 2008, 4:00:01 PM
Why would 20 floors ot wtc weight flatten 80 floors of uncompromised structure?
Because each of the remaning 80 are not designed to hold the weight of the 20 that
fell on them..........79,78,77,76,
shiva2999
February 10th, 2008, 8:35:01 PM
Because each of the remaning 80 are not designed to hold the weight of the 20 that
fell on them..........79,78,77,76,
Gee, how were they supporting them for the last 40 years?
Magic?
shiva2999
February 10th, 2008, 8:39:53 PM
what happens when a tall house of cards is constructed and you drop 30 additional floors worth of cards onto it from one card length in height? Static load vs dynamic load.
:rofl:
All the cards in the WTC building were Kraz-ee glued together.
Try again.
sukie
February 10th, 2008, 9:34:45 PM
Static load bearing
Green Lantern
February 10th, 2008, 9:39:11 PM
Static load bearing
How much extra force is accumulated from an 8 ft. drop?
shiva2999
February 10th, 2008, 9:42:34 PM
Static load bearing
Go jump on a cardboard box.
GOPchick
February 10th, 2008, 9:51:46 PM
My first question here is how in the heck did this guy live?
Holy shit! That is one crazy guy to do that!
shiva2999
February 10th, 2008, 10:02:10 PM
My first question here is how in the heck did this guy live?
Holy shit! That is one crazy guy to do that!
Amazing, isn't it?
But the fact is stuntmen have been doing high falls into cardboard boxes since the invention of the motion picture camera.
GOPchick
February 10th, 2008, 10:07:57 PM
Amazing, isn't it?
But the fact is stuntmen have been doing high falls into cardboard boxes since the invention of the motion picture camera.
very amazing! But why cardboard boxes? Why do people live when falling into boxes? This is very intersting shit!
35Pete
February 10th, 2008, 10:28:09 PM
Static load bearing
Your feet are static load bearing. So what?
shiva2999
February 10th, 2008, 10:28:55 PM
very amazing! But why cardboard boxes? Why do people live when falling into boxes? This is very intersting shit!
Indeed. I am trying to get a certain section of the board to address it but, alas, they don't seem to want to.
GOPchick
February 10th, 2008, 10:30:46 PM
Indeed. I am trying to get a certain section of the board to address it but, alas, they don't seem to want to.
well I want to so screw them.
how far up do you think he was? How many feet?
How many rows of boxes were there - I couldn't tell 100% It looked like 5 or 6?
shiva2999
February 10th, 2008, 10:36:15 PM
well I want to so screw them.
how far up do you think he was? How many feet?
How many rows of boxes were there - I couldn't tell 100% It looked like 5 or 6?
He fell about 150' and looked like he weighed about 150 lbs.
That's a shitload of kinetic energy.
To think it could be slowed and then stopped by a few dozen empty cardboard boxes is pretty ****ing amazing, isn't it?
GOPchick
February 10th, 2008, 10:43:22 PM
He fell about 150' and looked like he weighed about 150 lbs.
That's a shitload of kinetic energy.
To think it could be slowed and then stopped by a few dozen empty cardboard boxes is pretty ****ing amazing, isn't it?
I think he weighed more not sure if that matters. I watched that video about 3 times in a row.
It is very amazing. Some of the people who feel out of the towers feel about that many feet and to think all they had to do is put some empty boxes down there we would have had a lot more suvivors.
35Pete
February 10th, 2008, 10:55:45 PM
According to the 9/11 crowd Shiva, structural failure of the boxes caused that man to crash through those boxes without losing any kinetic energy.
He's dead. It's just a hoax.
Green Lantern
February 10th, 2008, 11:00:41 PM
According to the 9/11 crowd Shiva, structural failure of the boxes caused that man to crash through those boxes without losing any kinetic energy.
He's dead. It's just a hoax.
The video DID stop before I saw him get up and walk away.
GOPchick
February 10th, 2008, 11:01:21 PM
yeah but you could still here him making noise
shiva2999
February 10th, 2008, 11:14:47 PM
The video DID stop before I saw him get up and walk away.
The highest one I ever supervised was 80' feet into 10' of boxes.
Mr. Politenessman
February 11th, 2008, 1:38:31 AM
what happens when a tall house of cards is constructed and you drop 30 additional floors worth of cards onto it from one card length in height? Static load vs dynamic load.
Why don't people get this?
Today I picked up a bullet and tossed it at my head. Therefore, how can one shot from a gun hurt me?
Mouldsie
February 11th, 2008, 5:14:22 AM
lol that line needs to be in a will ferrel movie
sukie
February 11th, 2008, 7:15:21 AM
Your feet are static load bearing. So what?
So if I fell 12 feet the load on my feet would be more than 197 lbs. Ouch.
shiva2999
February 11th, 2008, 9:18:56 AM
Why don't people get this?
Today I picked up a bullet and tossed it at my head. Therefore, how can one shot from a gun hurt me?
Try a sack of hammers instead.
I'm sure a guy like you has one lying around somewhere.
35Pete
February 11th, 2008, 12:31:34 PM
Why don't people get this?
Today I picked up a bullet and tossed it at my head. Therefore, how can one shot from a gun hurt me?
Problem is that the top of the building started at ZERO velocity. Why don't you get that?
The intiation of collapse started (110-80)/80 = 73% above the rest of the building. Are you trying to suggest that the top 27% caused the bottom 73% to collapse that fast?
I'd like to see those numbers. I really would.
Yeah it's heavy. So what?
sukie
February 11th, 2008, 12:44:30 PM
Pete wouldn't the above stories accelerate downward the 12 feet at about 18-19 mph?
shiva2999
February 11th, 2008, 12:51:38 PM
Pete wouldn't the above stories accelerate downward the 12 feet at about 18-19 mph?
How fast was our jumper falling sukie?
GOPchick
February 11th, 2008, 12:55:20 PM
I want to know what is the significance to the card board boxes? Why do thye fall into them?
shiva2999
February 11th, 2008, 1:00:59 PM
I want to know what is the significance to the card board boxes? Why do thye fall into them?
Because cardboard boxes, as flimsy as they are, dissipate the falling object's kinetic energy.
Just like the bottom 80 floors of the WTC would dissipate the kinetic energy of the falling 20 floors.
sukie
February 11th, 2008, 1:43:34 PM
Except Cardboard Boxed are homogeneous in nature on all six sides. Cut out four of the six sides for windows and leave top and bottom intact. Then try experiment.
shiva2999
February 11th, 2008, 1:56:43 PM
Except Cardboard Boxed are homogeneous in nature on all six sides. Cut out four of the six sides for windows and leave top and bottom intact. Then try experiment.
The...stupidity...never...stops...
sukie
February 11th, 2008, 1:57:53 PM
Is a building built with homogeneity on all six sides?
shiva2999
February 11th, 2008, 2:02:27 PM
Is a building built with homogeneity on all six sides?
Sigh.
sukie
February 11th, 2008, 9:45:27 PM
Oh Petey...
35Pete
February 11th, 2008, 10:01:48 PM
Pete wouldn't the above stories accelerate downward the 12 feet at about 18-19 mph?
mph is speed in ft/sec. Acceleration is in ft/s^2.
The top of the building started at 0 ft/sec.
35Pete
February 11th, 2008, 10:02:17 PM
Oh Petey...
You're physics knowledge is pathetic. The answer is no.,
sukie
February 11th, 2008, 10:03:42 PM
Why load on my feet from 12 feet of drop should be the same?
sukie
February 11th, 2008, 10:04:30 PM
mph is speed in ft/sec. Acceleration is in ft/s^2.
The top of the building started at 0 ft/sec.
I understand zero but what is the speed at 12 feet?
35Pete
February 11th, 2008, 10:08:39 PM
I understand zero but what is the speed at 12 feet?
I already calculated it. Prove to me that you know what you are talking about and tell me please.
sukie
February 11th, 2008, 10:09:26 PM
Is the speed around 19 mph? Give or take for mass x?
35Pete
February 11th, 2008, 10:23:33 PM
Is the speed around 19 mph? Give or take for mass x?
The speed at free fall is independent of mass. So you don't know what you are talking about?
Mass only comes into play when momentum is reduced. That reduces KE and hence v resulting in decreased acceleration.
LOL!
So, what should the speed be?
35Pete
February 11th, 2008, 10:35:00 PM
I didn't think that I'd get an answer. So here. Educate yourself.
Actually you are right, but only for free fall. If the columsn buckled as you claim that would SLOW IT DOWN CONSIDERABLY But the building top started at 0 mph. It dropped 12 feet in AT LEAST .864 seconds.
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y241/35Pete/feet_sec.jpg
For free fall only, which kinda contradicts your assertion that they didn't fall too fast. Know what I mean Vern?
sukie
February 12th, 2008, 7:01:42 AM
So the buckling slows it down... what? About 18ish mph?
Mr. Politenessman
February 15th, 2008, 9:41:22 PM
Problem is that the top of the building started at ZERO velocity. Why don't you get that?
The intiation of collapse started (110-80)/80 = 73% above the rest of the building. Are you trying to suggest that the top 27% caused the bottom 73% to collapse that fast?
I'd like to see those numbers. I really would.
Yeah it's heavy. So what?
Seriously, get some medicine.
"Are you trying to suggest." No, I watched it. Are you drunk?
35Pete
February 15th, 2008, 10:06:35 PM
Seriously, get some medicine.
"Are you trying to suggest." No, I watched it. Are you drunk?
Seriously Go screw yourself.
Green Lantern
February 15th, 2008, 10:07:07 PM
I'm drunk.
Green Lantern
February 15th, 2008, 10:10:04 PM
I'm ordering Bing Crosby albums online and looking for pictures of Rita Moreno naked.
Mr. Politenessman
February 15th, 2008, 10:41:50 PM
I'm ordering Bing Crosby albums online and looking for pictures of Rita Moreno naked.
Yes you are drunk.
Mr. Politenessman
February 15th, 2008, 10:42:32 PM
Seriously Go screw yourself.
I am afraid I might scratch my dick on the tinfoil.
Green Lantern
February 15th, 2008, 10:44:22 PM
Yes you are drunk.
I'm so drunk I'm using contractions. That is a big no-no in academia. Screw those tightasses though.
jimmifli
February 15th, 2008, 10:49:44 PM
****'em.
Green Lantern
February 15th, 2008, 10:53:47 PM
Did you know after LBJ left office he grew a ponytail and became a hippie? More useless shit I know.
He was terrified of dying alone and they found him on his bed after his death clutching a phone. Poor bastard.
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.