I hope all minority groups

[sukie]

DIE...

Should I be banned?

[Green Lantern]

...

[sukie]

If yes why?

[stepsukie]

I call T.U.I. (typing under the influence)

[Green Lantern]

Take heart, Sukie. We are, all of us, mortal. They will all die, eventually.

[TigerJ]

Careful Sukie. You might find you are in one.

[JLB]

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/c_KVsJLFxz0"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/c_KVsJLFxz0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

Andrea Bocelli & Zucchero - Miserere

AWESOME!!!!!!!!

[sukie]

I always type under the influence If not I'd have you cutting the lawn on weekends

[Green Lantern]

I call T.U.I. (typing under the influence)

Not really a valid defense. Alcohol loosens the tongue, does not put thoughts in the head.

[г]

DIE...

Starting with the Polish...

[sukie]

Where is the outrage? i stated my position...

[sukie]

I guess my minority hatred is tainted by the fact I am not a New England fan.

[JLB]

Where is the outrage? i stated my position...

you just don't have the Uppy pizzazz sorry.:D

[Green Lantern]

Is Uppy getting beat up on some other thread?

[JLB]

Is Uppy getting beat up on some other thread?

not really.:D

[г]

Where is the outrage? i stated my position...

'outrage' is for your fellow freep-tards

[Gibby]

DIE...

Should I be banned?

I for one am personally outraged as my wife and my children (baby is in the oven as they say) and when you say all minorities should die you make a threat to my woman and my children. However since I smell sarcasm, what with the newly upgraded sarcasmometer installed, I laugh.

[Gibby]

DIE...

Should I be banned?

wait you said minority groups and not specific groups, so yes like you I hope many minority groups -especially repugnants- perish. Exemptions for minorities made for wife and her family.

[Ralonzo]

DIE...

Should I be banned?

No, but you would be as wrong to say that the will of the majority should be the law of the land, simply because it's the will of the majority.

Laws exist to protect individuals from the predation of the majority.

[Ralonzo]

Not really a valid defense. Alcohol loosens the tongue, does not put thoughts in the head.

One might have said in vino veritas

[C Darwin]

Save the minorities, shoot the people that support minority "special rights".

[Gibby]

Save the minorities, shoot the people that support minority "special rights".

just to clarify (or give you a hard time, I forget which) you are for equal rights though right?

[sukie]

Gibby. I give you credit throughout this thread. You first took offense to the thread premise then "felt" sarcasm. You went after my thoughts. You also happened to be correct.

The troubling part to that is the fact you judged my thoughts and responded based on your perception of my thoughts. Now if you didn't feel sarcasm you would still be pissed.

Thought policing doesn't work and cannot be used in debate or discussion since it is rather unreliable...

[Gibby]

Gibby. I give you credit throughout this thread. You first took offense to the thread premise then "felt" sarcasm. You went after my thoughts. You also happened to be correct.

The troubling part to that is the fact you judged my thoughts and responded based on your perception of my thoughts. Now if you didn't feel sarcasm you would still be pissed.

Thought policing doesn't work and cannot be used in debate or discussion since it is rather unreliable...

Nope, you missed it buddy. The first part I was joking about because I knew you were speaking with jest. The second part I was telling you the truth.

[sukie]

Gibby, jlb said it best... I guess I just don't have Uppy's pizzazz

[FamousAmos]

forgive me for speaking freely, but Sukie, you're like the racist grandma that says horrible things at the dinner table but the rest of the family carries on with their own conversation.

[sukie]

I'm actually one of the least racist here but I get your point.

[FamousAmos]

okay

[FamousAmos]

its not a bad thing, because what Uppy has and you lack is conviction, I think, in what you say here

[C Darwin]

just to clarify (or give you a hard time, I forget which) you are for equal rights though right?

With out question.

[uppy]

DIE...

Should I be banned?

As long as gays arn't inculded
it will pass the sniff test.

Also illegal aliens

[JLB]

and guys wearing blue shoes.:D

[K-Gun]

DIE...

Should I be banned?

Click the TOS link in your sig and read #4:

No racist comments. No sexist comments. No derogatory comments referring to the sexual preference of other posters.

If you can say that without censure than we don't enforce the TOS.

But hey, who cares about the TOS?

[ICRockets]

and guys wearing blue shoes.:D

No, Uppy already said gays. You must have missed it.

[ICRockets]

Click the TOS link in your sig and read #4:

No racist comments. No sexist comments. No derogatory comments referring to the sexual preference of other posters.

If you can say that without censure than we don't enforce the TOS.

But hey, who cares about the TOS?

My question is, is it ok to censure him knowing full well he's joking?

On the other hand, is it ok to let such broad hate speech slide and let him set a precedent of egregious TOS abuse?

This is why I'm glad I'm not a mod.

[JLB]

No, Uppy already said gays. You must have missed it.

:rockon:

[K-Gun]

I guess it is cool to make racist statements on the Range. Who Knew? (screw the TOS)

[C Darwin]

Better to screw the TOS than have is selectively enforced along political lines.

[sukie]

Click the TOS link in your sig and read #4:

No racist comments. No sexist comments. No derogatory comments referring to the sexual preference of other posters.

If you can say that without censure than we don't enforce the TOS.

But hey, who cares about the TOS?

K Gun is correct. Although this was a thought police experiment. I am closing this down.

[K-Gun]

K Gun is correct. Although this was a thought police experiment. I am closing this down.

Why shut it down? It makes a great point. uppy may not have meant what i thought he meant, but that doesn't change the fact that we have higher standards guarding against racism as we do against gay bashing.

[pmoon6]

Why shut it down? It makes a great point. uppy may not have meant what i thought he meant, but that doesn't change the fact that we have higher standards guarding against racism as we do against gay bashing.I think that is true and you do make a good point. As you well know, I take liberties with the TOS sometimes. 99% of the time, I'm just messing with people.

I will say I've never been warned about using "faggit" (misspelled purposely), but alot of people got their shorts in a bunch when I told Chimp to "Go down the street and see how the beans were jumpin'".

What's worse?

[K-Gun]

I think that is true and you do make a good point. As you well know, I take liberties with the TOS sometimes. 99% of the time, I'm just messing with people.

I will say I've never been warned about using "faggit" (misspelled purposely), but alot of people got their shorts in a bunch when I told Chimp to "Go down the street and see how the beans were jumpin'".

What's worse?

bout the same, imo.

[uppy]

My question is, is it ok to censure him knowing full well he's joking?

On the other hand, is it ok to let such broad hate speech slide and let him set a precedent of egregious TOS abuse?

This is why I'm glad I'm not a mod.

There are Christians that post in the fourm ...but I've never seen a mod or
any one have a temper tantram when "hate speech" is used about Christians

Why is that ?

Could it be that Christians are open to debate, or is it OK to bash them

Can someone answer this please ?

[shiva2999]

Oh, c'mon.

What hate speech have you seen directed at Christians?

[Sock Puppet]

Pardon me, I'm new here. Is this a discussion of how criticizm or disaproval of women, minorities, and homosexuals is concidered "bashing", but to do the same to Christians and whites is just fine?

I hope there are no double standards on this board like that.

[uppy]

Thats funny Shiva.....What hate speech have you seen directed at gays ?

[JLB]

Pardon me, I'm new here. Is this a discussion of how criticizm or disaproval of women, minorities, and homosexuals is concidered "bashing", but to do the same to Christians and whites is just fine?

I hope there are no double standards on this board like that.

these are all basically full of shit threads here for your entertainment.

but if you bash your visit might be short.

[uppy]

Pardon me, I'm new here. Is this a discussion of how criticizm or disaproval of women, minorities, and homosexuals is concidered "bashing", but to do the same to Christians and whites is just fine?

I hope there are no double standards on this board like that.

Sock puppet....I like that name LOL

The left goes nuts when they start losing the debate.

Then its called hate speech

Its the old lawyer tictic:when the facts are not on your side attack the witness

[shiva2999]

Thats funny Shiva.....What hate speech have you seen directed at gays ?

Have I ever complained about hate speech?

[shiva2999]

Pardon me, I'm new here. Is this a discussion of how criticizm or disaproval of women, minorities, and homosexuals is concidered "bashing", but to do the same to Christians and whites is just fine?

I hope there are no double standards on this board like that.

Bashing cranky and stupid middle class white Christian men can never be hate speech.

There is too much truth involved.

[uppy]

Have I ever complained about hate speech?

Shiva, you have always been open to discussion as have I.

[shiva2999]

Sock puppet....I like that name LOL

The left goes nuts when they start losing the debate.

Then its called hate speech

Its the old lawyer tictic:when the facts are not on your side attack the witness

Uppy and jlb have supported banning people for their political opinions.

I have never supported banning anyone for anything.

[uppy]

Bashing cranky and stupid middle class white Christian men can never be hate speech.

There is too much truth involved.

There is too much truth involved all the way around to shut down debate
on all issues

[shiva2999]

Shiva, you have always been open to discussion as have I.

Not about Pat Tillman.

And let's not forget your role in lynching chimpy.

[shiva2999]

There is too much truth involved all the way around to shut down debate
on all issues

Two wrongs don't make a right, you crazy right wing cracker.

[uppy]

Uppy and jlb have supported banning people for their political opinions.

I have never supported banning anyone for anything.


Uppy has NEVER supported banning anyone for anything.You have made
this statment before and failed to back it up.It was a LIE

The King then used the fact that I asked GIL to close my account for
24 hrs as proof that I have asked for a poster to be banned.

:rofl:

[uppy]

Not about Pat Tillman.

And let's not forget your role in lynching chimpy.

Thats a lie....I had no part in the chimpy banning

[shiva2999]

Thats a lie....I had no part in the chimpy banning

:rofl:

I didn't have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.

[uppy]

:rofl:

I didn't have sex with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.

Prove it or shut up.....I had no part in Chimps banning or any posters
banning

I have never sent a mod a PM,a E-mail nothing about banning any
one.

[shiva2999]

I read the thread before it disappeared.

[uppy]

I read the thread before it disappeared.

What thread ?

The one Chimpie got banned for ?

[shiva2999]

What thread ?

The one Chimpie got banned for ?

The one where you advocated his lynching.

I remember it quite clearly.

[uppy]

The one where you advocated his lynching.

I remember it quite clearly.

Guess again, dipshit I stopped posting on page 3 of that 20 + page thread.

Chris,PM me asking for support and I said NO

[Sock Puppet]

Two wrongs don't make a right, you crazy right wing cracker.
Hate speech vilation!! Let's see how this is enforced.

[shiva2999]

Hate speech vilation!! Let's see how this is enforced.

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dytXVjv08cE"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dytXVjv08cE" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

[shiva2999]

Guess again, dipshit I stopped posting on page 3 of that 20 + page thread.

Chris,PM me asking for support and I said NO

Sure.

[uppy]

Sure.

Fact

[Sock Puppet]

Excellent!

[Gibby]

Uppy and jlb have supported banning people for their political opinions.

I have never supported banning anyone for anything.

shiva has a point here. :D

[JLB]

shiva has a point here. :D

impossible.:D

[uppy]

shiva has a point here. :D


Its a lie