PDA

View Full Version : Ruff/Regier Finally Speak


PG 13
June 14th, 2007, 10:20:30 AM
http://www.wgr550.com/sabres/fullstory.php?id=2452

Interesting comments here:



BUFFALO, NY (WGR 550) - After weeks of silence from the Buffalo Sabres, Larry Quinn announced the signings of general manager Darcy Regier and head coach Lindy Ruff to multi-year deals, which Quinn said were signed for under market value.

"There wasn't a question of leaving at all," said Ruff, who signed for three years with an option. "We've put a lot of work into getting it where it's at, and we know there's a tremendous amount of work ahead of us. We feel we have some really good talent, and some really good talent coming."

Regier, saying the Sabres experience is "exciting and incomplete," signed for two years. The general manager said he's not concerned with the team's budget.

"I think when you start off in this job, you're happy to get the job. You don't care what the payroll is," Regier said. "We've come to realize that this business can be very cyclical, and you have to deal with the hand your dealt, and you have to be grateful for the opportunity, and maximize whatever resources you have."

Quinn said there was an agreement before the playoffs that Ruff and Regier would return to the Sabres, and that money shouldn't be a big issue.

"The budget we're going to spend this year will be greater than the one we had last year," Ruff said. "All the doom and gloom... is nothing to worry about."

Both Ruff and Regier got into what needs fixing with the team, and what went wrong for the President's Trophy winners.

Regier said the team was able to overcome deficits in the regular season by outscoring teams, but that changed in the post-season.

"I don't think it works that well in the playoffs," Regier said. "It's very difficult to score your way out. If we were to look at one area, it would be let's figure out a way to prevent goals. It's more about preventing than it is about scoring."

Ruff said his whole staff is coming back, but wouldn't rule out an additional coach. He spoke to the team's special teams ills.

"Special teams we pretty handled the same way throughout my coaching tenure here, where we have coaching meetings (and) a common philosophy on special teams," said Ruff, who's posted a 358-271 record with 78 ties and 31 overtime losses in nine seasons with the club. "Obviously this year was disappointing. Typically in the past our penalty killing has always been a strong point. I think last year was an exception to the rule. Being one of the worst PK teams at home was a shock."

The focus was on the off-season, and while Regier said both unrestricted free agents Chris Drury and Daniel Briere are open to remaining Buffalo Sabres, he also said the team needed to evaluate where they stood before opening up potential contracts talks.

"Mostly because of our own evaluations," Regier said. "We did meet right after the season. As a hockey staff, you get the initial reaction as to what just took place. We really let things settle out. The other side is the players what time as well... to evaluate their own positions."

All three know money is an issue.

"We have to be responsible, and that doesn't mean cheapen it or lower the player budget," Quinn said. "If the guy is looking for the last dollar, as good as he might be, you probably don't want him."

Regier said he's spoken with Briere and Drury.

"With one of the player's representatives, I've had very preliminary conversations and they will continue in the next week," Regier said, while refusing to specify whom. "With the other, we've exchange phone calls and will continue in the same timeline."

The team will - at least initially - not negotiate with restricted free agent winger Thomas Vanek.

"I'm not a believer in operating out of fear," Regier said. "I've seen it take place where you pay for it because of some rumor. He's a very good player, a very important player, and there's a market value and you have to stay the course. We'll be fine with Thomas at the end of the day."

Ruff talked about the possibility of being without Drury and/or Briere.

"You deal with that when and if it happens," Ruff said. "We have a tremendous group of players and they're a big part of it. There's always gonna be changes, I think it's part of today's game."

Regier said it's "probably fair" to say that players would understand negotiating with the co-captains during the season. Quinn said they don't negotiate contracts during the year because giving a player a big new deal makes the other players worry if they will be the cap casualty after the year.

"If you talk team first, you gotta act it," Quinn said, adding that the organization realizes the price could escalate by waiting.

Ruff told WGR's Paul Hamilton that the Sabres aren't necessarily looking outside the organization, specifically on defense.

"There's areas inside that can improve without going outside," Ruff said. "Henrik Tallinder went through almost a year and a half without upper body training. I think Toni is maybe our most physical guy on the back end. You always can look and think, 'Boy, if we can get that one guy.' It's easy to talk about, not easy to find."

On the topic of resigning Teppo Numminen or giving Nathan Paetsch more ice time, Ruff started with a thought on the younger defenseman.

"He got some real great experience," Ruff said. "I also think a guy like Teppo had a very good year, a very good playoff. I don't think you can ignore that. He knows how to play the game. He understands the game. You go to a guy like Nathan... in training camp... he'll make the decision for us."

Drury, Briere, Mair, Zubrus, Numminen and Conklin could all be out the door after the start of free agency on July 1, and Ruff said it isn't an easy time of year to be a coach.

"As a coach, we've put together a pretty special group of players," he said. "We've lost five real good people going into the season. Part of that is business of trying to fit things in. I'm sitting here thinking you really don't want to lose anybody. You don't get to where you're going unless you have players who want to play. The loss leaves a scar."

Tough calls lie ahead in terms of resigning players, adding new parts and how much to spend, but Ruff said coming back was an easy decision.

"I have one goal, and that's the win a Cup, and that best chance is here," he said.

Widely regarded as a top playoff coach, Ruff has won nearly 60 percent of the post-season games he's coached, registering a 52-36 mark in leading the team to four Eastern Conference Finals and one Stanley Cup Final. The Sabres have won 10 of the 16 series he's coached.

PG 13
June 14th, 2007, 10:34:38 AM
I think these are the most interesting comments:

"The budget we're going to spend this year will be greater than the one we had last year," Ruff said. "All the doom and gloom... is nothing to worry about."

My opinion: Nothing to do with this comment, but Drury and Briere aren't coming back. If the budget is higher, who are the targeting?

Maybe this is the answer to the type of player:

Regier said the team was able to overcome deficits in the regular season by outscoring teams, but that changed in the post-season.

"I don't think it works that well in the playoffs," Regier said. "It's very difficult to score your way out. If we were to look at one area, it would be let's figure out a way to prevent goals. It's more about preventing than it is about scoring."

But it seems that they like their D: "Ruff told WGR's Paul Hamilton that the Sabres aren't necessarily looking outside the organization, specifically on defense."


I think they're going to make a run at some hard nosed, gritty forwards..

CoachC.
June 14th, 2007, 10:40:36 AM
This article tells me:

-They are very satisfied with the young talent they have and feel a few are ready to step up;

-They would like to have Drury and Briere both back, but don't expect them to be in a position re-sign them;

-Vanek isn't going anywhere;

-This team is in no way about to tear down and rebuild. They all feel they just need to re-tool a few things and can still compete for a Cup; And Ruff would not have re-signed if he felt otherwise;

-Although they won't break the bank in salary, they will still pay market value for the players they feel are most important to them. (They just won't over-pay). And their "budget constrictions" are being way overblown by fans and the media.

Waiting until everything settled down to evaluate and speak about 2006 and the future was the right move. You never want to make business decisions based upon immediate emotions.

Personally, I feel this organization is in very good hands right now.

I, as every fan does, question moves sometimes. But at the end of the day, the track record of both R & R have earned them the benefit of the doubt. They've built an organization that will continue to compete at a high level for at least several more years.

I'm still pissed we didn't win the Cup, and feel they underachieved this season by falling short of the finals. But after hearing these guys speak about the current state of the organization, I feel much better about it's future than I did three weeks ago.

dilbert
June 14th, 2007, 10:45:00 AM
I tend to agree Coach. I also like the part about the budget being higher than last year. Hopefully that calms down the panic mode people.

I still think there is a good chance one of the two big names is back. I pray it is Drury.

PG 13
June 14th, 2007, 10:48:35 AM
In my mind, there's no excuse not to sign Drury. None. Not any amount of $$.

But I really believe it's more of him not wanting to play for the Sabres anymore, and not anything the Sabres have decided budget wise. But I blame this on how the Sabres are running things these days. Right or wrong, it clearly isn't something that Drury is buying into.

dilbert
June 14th, 2007, 10:50:49 AM
In my mind, there's no excuse not to sign Drury. None. Not any amount of $$.

But I really believe it's more of him not wanting to play for the Sabres anymore, and not anything the Sabres have decided budget wise. But I blame this on how the Sabres are running things these days. Right or wrong, it clearly isn't something that Drury is buying into.


Then that might be a problem with Drury. His pal left because he said the Sabres were not willing to spend enough for a winner and he was wrong.

They should do everything in their power to sign Drury. But if he is unwilling, they can't make him sign.

PG 13
June 14th, 2007, 10:51:49 AM
I tend to agree Coach. I also like the part about the budget being higher than last year. Hopefully that calms down the panic mode people.

I still think there is a good chance one of the two big names is back. I pray it is Drury.

I don't think there's a chance in hell either come back.

To just begin to negotiate in the exclusive period they have right now is a sure sign that they aren't that interested. They did the same exact think last year with McKee. Had some minor talks with him, but nothing that showed any huge interest. They're doing the same here.

Hate to say it, but Drury and Breire are gone..

Thumper
June 14th, 2007, 11:55:01 AM
I don't think there's a chance in hell either come back.

To just begin to negotiate in the exclusive period they have right now is a sure sign that they aren't that interested. They did the same exact think last year with McKee. Had some minor talks with him, but nothing that showed any huge interest. They're doing the same here.

Hate to say it, but Drury and Breire are gone..

I totally disagree. Why would they be willing to concede that they will spend even more on the roster than they did last year?? The reason the payroll is going to be higher is because they need to wrap up Drury, as well as improve the team. There's no doubt in my mind about that. What else would force them to exceed 44 million??

They also left no doubt that if July 1st hits, and neither has signed, by then, then neither one will be back. I think that was said because they expect to sign Drury before July 1st.

SabreNasty2630
June 14th, 2007, 12:00:00 PM
Drury, Vanek, Zubrus, a gritty forward or two and MAYBE 1 physical defensemen would make this a very exciting and satisfying offseason for me

unklechucky
June 14th, 2007, 12:34:58 PM
No mention of Ruff's comments on Max?

Thumper
June 14th, 2007, 12:45:59 PM
No mention of Ruff's comments on Max?

No one asked.

PG 13
June 14th, 2007, 1:00:39 PM
I totally disagree. Why would they be willing to concede that they will spend even more on the roster than they did last year?? The reason the payroll is going to be higher is because they need to wrap up Drury, as well as improve the team. There's no doubt in my mind about that. What else would force them to exceed 44 million??

They also left no doubt that if July 1st hits, and neither has signed, by then, then neither one will be back. I think that was said because they expect to sign Drury before July 1st.

Well, I really hope you're right. Like I said, my logic of Drury and Briere walking and them exceeding last years 44 million budget is almost impossible to imagine.

But I just don't feel real good about what seems to be a lack of talks and urgency between them so far that Darcy commented on today:

"With one of the player's representatives, I've had very preliminary conversations and they will continue in the next week," Regier said, while refusing to specify whom. "With the other, we've exchange phone calls and will continue in the same timeline."

Like I said, it seems just like the McKee situation all over again.

M76
June 14th, 2007, 1:05:36 PM
3 year deal??! WTF??? yea ruff is a great coach in the ecf and finals 1-3? i am reallllllly sick of Lawrence quinn he needs to get the boot.. not negotiating during the regular season is why this team has and continues to lose good players (oh no groan me)

mikgaes
June 14th, 2007, 1:09:54 PM
No mention of Ruff's comments on Max?


He was there to comment on his new signing. Did he have to comment on every guy today?

Thumper
June 14th, 2007, 1:19:12 PM
3 year deal??! WTF??? yea ruff is a great coach in the ecf and finals 1-3? i am reallllllly sick of Lawrence quinn he needs to get the boot.. not negotiating during the regular season is why this team has and continues to lose good players (oh no groan me)

Do you refuse to acknowledge the results? And don't come back with "they didn't win the Cup" because every single year, 29 teams don't win the Cup, and at the same time, aren't as successful or as competitive as the Buffalo Sabres. Their time is coming.

Thumper
June 14th, 2007, 1:25:57 PM
Well, I really hope you're right. Like I said, my logic of Drury and Briere walking and them exceeding last years 44 million budget is almost impossible to imagine.

But I just don't feel real good about what seems to be a lack of talks and urgency between them so far that Darcy commented on today:

"With one of the player's representatives, I've had very preliminary conversations and they will continue in the next week," Regier said, while refusing to specify whom. "With the other, we've exchange phone calls and will continue in the same timeline."

Like I said, it seems just like the McKee situation all over again.

I think the general feeling is this:

If Drury or Briere or both of them really want to come back, then they've already decided that they want to. And they'll come back before July 1st as long as they're offered a fair contract.

The result of the season has now sunk in for everyone at this point. Drury and Briere may not have wanted to worry about it for a few weeks so that they could have their vacation.....Some time off.....some time to reflect on their time in Buffalo, and time to ponder what they want to do in the immediate future. Now everyone has a better grasp on what they want. They'll get offers, and either they'll sign or they won't sign.

The fact that the Sabres are spending over 44 million on next years payroll tells me they have every intention of giving Chris Drury a very, very serious offer.

Scary Good
June 14th, 2007, 2:20:29 PM
Good news. Hopefully Dru will be in talks with them.

amico1990
June 14th, 2007, 2:46:10 PM
3 year deal??! WTF??? yea ruff is a great coach in the ecf and finals 1-3? i am reallllllly sick of Lawrence quinn he needs to get the boot.. not negotiating during the regular season is why this team has and continues to lose good players (oh no groan me)


Are you seriously upset that Lindy Ruff resigned with us?

M76
June 14th, 2007, 3:16:56 PM
3 years yes.. how much talent does this great playoff coach need to win the cup? best goalie of the past 15 years (brodeur can make an arguement) nope that didn't work.. presidents trophy winner nope.. taking the league by surprise with a young fast high scoring team? nope .. if he doesn't do it in the next year or MAYBE 2 what is the justification for keeping him

dilbert
June 14th, 2007, 3:34:13 PM
OK, so they fire Ruff.

Who is better that they can bring in?

smashingt2312
June 14th, 2007, 3:46:22 PM
OK, so they fire Ruff.

Who is better that they can bring in?

mike keenan?

:bigsmile:

But the one thing that really made me happy from this conference is that they are willing to spend more than the 44 million.

Thumper
June 14th, 2007, 4:41:55 PM
3 years yes.. how much talent does this great playoff coach need to win the cup? best goalie of the past 15 years (brodeur can make an arguement) nope that didn't work.. presidents trophy winner nope.. taking the league by surprise with a young fast high scoring team? nope .. if he doesn't do it in the next year or MAYBE 2 what is the justification for keeping him

Right! Because the HEAD COACH has had NOTHING to do with the developement of all of this talent, right? You're so short-sighted its laughable.

sksteele
June 14th, 2007, 7:18:36 PM
I love the super smart guys who read that Briere and Drury arnt coming back. Do the math - they said they will spend MORE on salaries than last year. With 28 million commited that means they have 17 MILLION to spend, and not that many holes. You could sign Briere 6m, Drury 7m, Vanek 4m, and trade a guy like Kotalik or Kalinin to have enough left for Mair etc.

MAybe they both wont be back but I cant stand all these people who say they KNOW they are gone.

Something to think about - if they wont commit long term to Drury or Briere, what big UFa do you think they will sign - NONE. Why would you spend big $$$ on Smyth or Souray if you let your own guys walk.

unklechucky
June 14th, 2007, 7:51:57 PM
These signings mean we can start focusing on signing players

Schtaad
June 14th, 2007, 8:00:29 PM
I am just gonna sit back and watch what all transpires.
What else can I do? It is totally out of my hands.
I still feel that Drury will be back though.
A little unfinished business to take care of, I think.

Thumper
June 15th, 2007, 2:48:24 PM
So where are all of those doom and gloomers around here? So far, only Mogilny76 has been the only one to show up in this thread, still preaching the same kind of negativity he was before the press conference.

Doom and gloomers: Show your faces. Quinn literally called you all out by name when he said " "All the doom and gloom... is nothing to worry about."

I found that funny.

dmoney
June 15th, 2007, 5:10:47 PM
mike keenan?

:bigsmile:

But the one thing that really made me happy from this conference is that they are willing to spend more than the 44 million.

This Just In.... Mike Keenan has hurt more teams than he has helped....