PDA

View Full Version : China, Pakistan team up on energy


Green Lantern
April 15th, 2007, 11:20:00 AM
The new Cold War.

China, Pakistan team up on energy

A new China-financed port on Pakistan's coast ups the ante in the new 'Great Game' for energy resources in the Middle East and Central Asia.

By David Montero | Correspondent of The Christian Science Monitor

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - If China is to become the economic powerhouse it envisions, the road to its new future could run, literally, through Pakistan.

Or so the two nations hope. Last month, they inaugurated Gwadar Port in Pakistan's Balochistan Province, the first step in an elaborate "energy corridor" that will one day ship Persian Gulf oil from Gwadar overland through Pakistan to China. China bankrolled the $200 million port and plans to put billions more into railways, roads, and pipelines linking Gwadar to China. Pakistan hopes it will generate $60 billion a year in transit fees in 20 years' time.

The deal could point to new fortunes on the horizon. But many observers wonder what price the two nations will pay for such inextricable energy ties.

Gwadar shines a spotlight on a little-studied dimension of the global showdown for the world's depleting oil. Pakistan, with Chinese money, hopes to reinvent itself as one of the region's largest energy players – but it could also become a victim of the new Great Game, some observers say, crushed in the squeeze between the American and Chinese race for influence in volatile, lucrative Central Asia.

As China positions itself as Pakistan's chief patron, that could tilt Pakistan's center of political gravity, observers add, outweighing US influence dollar for dollar – and without the strings of human rights, democracy, and counterterrorism attached.
"The Americans come with a great deal of ideological baggage. There's none of that with the Chinese," says Richard Russell, a professor of national security affairs at the National Defense University in Washington. "[Pakistan's] interactions with the Chinese are not nearly as radioactive as with the US."

Analysts have long fretted over a possible collision course between the US and China over energy. China is now the world's second-largest consumer of oil after the US. Its consumption is expected to double by 2025, with 70 percent coming from the Middle East. Both giants are competing for finite supplies....
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0413/p06s01-wosc.html

г
April 15th, 2007, 12:20:03 PM
And the Russian,and US interests through companies like Gazprom, Unocal etc, would love to be the middlemen. That's why we're in Afghanistan and in particular the Khandahar region because Taliban presence messes up a nice NG piplene route that goes straight through there to supply former Soviet Republic Turkmenistan gas from the Caspian Sea area to Pakistan and India.

Google 'Centgas' The project was cancelled in '98, but could be revived in an instant. You'll see more or less the same players in the Centgas consortium are now eyeing an Iran-Pakistan pipeline, but the big prize is the Caspian Sea to Mumbai pipeline. If the Taliban is eliminated and a puppet, police state is created, then voila...there's the needed stability & puppet-state signing authority for cheap or free right of way for the pipeline.

Green Lantern
April 15th, 2007, 12:28:23 PM
And the Russian,and US interests through companies like Gazprom, Unocal etc, would love to be the middlemen. That's why we're in Afghanistan and in particular the Khandahar region because Taliban presence messes up a nice NG piplene route that goes straight through there to supply former Soviet Republic Turkmenistan gas from the Caspian Sea area to Pakistan and India.

Google 'Centgas' The project was cancelled in '98, but could be revived in an instant. You'll see more or less the same players in the Centgas consortium are now eyeing an Iran-Pakistan pipeline, but the big prize is the Caspian Sea to Mumbai pipeline. If the Taliban is eliminated and a puppet, police state is created, then voila...there's the needed stability & puppet-state signing authority for cheap or free right of way for the pipeline.

I remember a guy from the Economist making the same comparisons just as we were invading Afghanistan. He said, "terrorism, bah! It is about getting oil to the sea and the US does not want to have to pay Russia, China, or Iran for the rights."

г
April 15th, 2007, 12:37:47 PM
Yep, follow the money and you'll find the motivation...

г
April 15th, 2007, 12:48:13 PM
And why is the BA bending over backwards weloming President Nazarbayev of Kazakhstan to the White House in September ?

For 'democracy' or to to 'support the forces of moderation throughout the world (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/09/20060929-5.html)' ? Bah - it's because they want to squeeze the guy's nuts to sign cheap or free pipline right of way deals so that US and other interests can supply (gasp) China with natural gas. Otherwise the guy's just an irrelevant Stan Schmenge.

http://sctv.org/characters/shmenges/shmengetravel.jpg

Green Lantern
April 15th, 2007, 1:13:52 PM
Yep, follow the money and you'll find the motivation...

D3 as "deepthroat"...

Shiva as Woodward with Coastal as Bernstein

And...Pete as Howard Hunt.