PDA

View Full Version : Thought police and the politically correct...


Gilly
April 12th, 2007, 5:46:39 PM
Thought police and the politically correct are rearing the ugly heads.
..Imus is an idiot. As a diehard Stern fan I always hated Imus. However, getting pounced upon and finally fired for saying a stupid and idiotic statemant is wrong.
Anyone remember freedom of speech? If you diagree with someone debate them. Pussy libs now whine, cry, make new laws against ideas they disagree with and then pretend they are holier than thou. Get a backbone and join the debate dont outlaw it. (range mods included)
I love it when people I diagree with spout off. Rosie, Hillary, shiv and shep, the more they talk the more they make my point. Rosie everyday spouting how America sucks, caused 911, and how we murdered a billion people in Iraq shows the average working stiff how loony the left is. The more she spews the better. Should we kick her off the air for being an idiot? hell no.

г
April 12th, 2007, 5:54:14 PM
Did you go to one of them there eastern, liberal universities to wraight all them there big words ?

JLB
April 12th, 2007, 5:56:18 PM
Sharpton wants to go after the rap artists next.

nehemiah
April 12th, 2007, 5:59:10 PM
so it was a law that got him fired? :rofl:

money talks. he sucks and being a racist is bad for ratings (except in the south). that's why he got fired.

as a martyr, douchebag imus is lacking.

г
April 12th, 2007, 6:02:28 PM
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GdzThgveHwQ"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GdzThgveHwQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

nehemiah
April 12th, 2007, 6:07:19 PM
:rofl:

Gilly
April 12th, 2007, 6:11:10 PM
so it was a law that got him fired? :rofl:



did i say that? read it again so you understand. new laws I was talking about are the new world lib laws, (helmet law, smoking bans, cellphone while driving bs, spanking, immigration amesty, capital gain tax increases. etc) any other stupid questions?

nehemiah
April 12th, 2007, 6:15:41 PM
so it was a law that got him fired? :rofl:



did i say that? read it again so you understand. new laws I was talking about are the new world lib laws, (helmet law, smoking bans, cellphone while driving bs, spanking, immigration amesty, capital gain tax increases. etc) any other stupid questions?:rofl:

i don't know, do you have anymore stupid posts left?

uppy
April 12th, 2007, 6:16:59 PM
We are slowly losing our First Amendment rights to the PC

Police.BTW, Imus is a liberal clown and the last left leaning

talk show host on the national airwaves.....and he is taken

out by the PC stormtroopers, the sweet irony of it all

life is good

Green Lantern
April 12th, 2007, 6:17:45 PM
[QUOTE=nehemiah;1620576]so it was a law that got him fired? :rofl:

/QUOTE]

did i say that? read it again so you understand. new laws I was talking about are the new world lib laws, (helmet law, smoking bans, cellphone while driving bs, spanking, immigration amesty, capital gain tax increases. etc) any other stupid questions?

Are you free to say anything you want at work?

г
April 12th, 2007, 6:19:17 PM
Hey, when you work at home, you're the king of your own trailer...

JLB
April 12th, 2007, 6:20:46 PM
Hey, when you work at home, you're the king of your own trailer...

:n4clapping: :rofl:

JerseyBillsFan
April 12th, 2007, 8:08:15 PM
Thought police and the politically correct are rearing the ugly heads.
..Imus is an idiot. As a diehard Stern fan I always hated Imus. However, getting pounced upon and finally fired for saying a stupid and idiotic statemant is wrong.
Anyone remember freedom of speech? If you diagree with someone debate them. Pussy libs now whine, cry, make new laws against ideas they disagree with and then pretend they are holier than thou. Get a backbone and join the debate dont outlaw it. (range mods included)
I love it when people I diagree with spout off. Rosie, Hillary, shiv and shep, the more they talk the more they make my point. Rosie everyday spouting how America sucks, caused 911, and how we murdered a billion people in Iraq shows the average working stiff how loony the left is. The more she spews the better. Should we kick her off the air for being an idiot? hell no.
Yee haw. Get the shotgun and load up the pickup. Don't forget the confederate flag now.

Gilly
April 12th, 2007, 8:42:58 PM
Yee haw. Get the shotgun and load up the pickup. Don't forget the confederate flag now.

exactly what part of my post is southern redneck racist? is it the part where i think a racist puke has the right to be a racist puke and say anything he wants?

uppy
April 12th, 2007, 9:16:25 PM
The race card has come up early in this thread,and to think

I thought it was about the First Amendment,what a dope I am.

Imus, is a moron and has been since he pimped bill clinton's bid

for the White House in "92" he is a tool of the left.

However, I think this debate should be ,"what words can we

use" ? The moonbat PC Police want to dictate the way our

language can be used and surpress what they don't like.

But, only if said language comes form a "non-PC pimp" the

rappers can say any thing that pops into their heads and it

gets a pass from the hyporites.


We are losing our language and our rights under the 1st

Amendment and the left in this country has its heads in the

sand because the PC movement was ment to quiet the right,

but now it goes after its own.....lol

Life is Good.

Green Lantern
April 12th, 2007, 9:21:43 PM
The race card has come up early in this thread,and to think

I thought it was about the First Amendment,what a dope I am.

Imus, is a moron and has been since he pimped bill clinton's bid

for the White House in "92" he is a tool of the left.

However, I think this debate should be ,"what words can we

use" ? The moonbat PC Police want to dictate the way our

language can be used and surpress what they don't like.

But, only if said language comes form a "non-PC pimp" the

rappers can say any thing that pops into their heads and it

gets a pass from the hyporites.


We are losing our language and our rights under the 1st

Amendment and the left in this country has its heads in the

sand because the PC movement was ment to quiet the right,

but now it goes after its own.....lol

Life is Good.

Still savoring the pain of others, I see. How's that Christianity thing working out for you, by the way.

uppy
April 12th, 2007, 9:25:58 PM
Still savoring the pain of others, I see. How's that Christianity thing working out for you, by the way.


The Christianity thing works out well for me...give it a try some

day.

Green Lantern
April 12th, 2007, 9:30:29 PM
The Christianity thing works out well for me...give it a try some

day.

My version includes not relishing suffering for enemies as well as friends, Jesus said so.

uppy
April 12th, 2007, 9:31:41 PM
Whats the limit of the first Amendment ? if some don't like

what is said should it be shut down by the goverment ?

Or should people that disagree ingore whats said ?

Whating for a moonbat's opinion

uppy
April 12th, 2007, 9:33:25 PM
My version includes not relishing suffering for enemies as well as friends, Jesus said so.

Thanks..to each his own

JerseyBillsFan
April 12th, 2007, 9:36:51 PM
Whats the limit of the first Amendment ? if some don't like

what is said should it be shut down by the goverment ?

Or should people that disagree ingore whats said ?

Whating for a moonbat's opinionWho got shut down by the government?

dilbert
April 12th, 2007, 9:42:11 PM
The great irony in all of is that one loud mount idiot jackass got fired because two other loud mouth idoit jackasses kept bitching about him.

BTW, this has NOTHING to do with free speech or the 1st Amendment. Nothing at all.

Gilly
April 12th, 2007, 9:45:26 PM
Who got shut down by the government?

motorcycle riders, cell phone users, smokers, legal immigrants, parents, stern before sirius, duke lacross players, people who earn alot of money

uppy
April 12th, 2007, 9:45:46 PM
Who got shut down by the government?

LMAO

I should have said the moonbats that run the MSM and the

demo crack-pots.

JerseyBillsFan
April 12th, 2007, 10:43:54 PM
motorcycle riders, cell phone users, smokers, legal immigrants, parents, stern before sirius, duke lacross players, people who earn alot of moneyOh. You mean people who affect the safety and well being of others. Pity that smokers can't blow their smoke in the face of others anymore. I'm bleeding inside. Really I am.

gilchristfan
April 12th, 2007, 11:51:35 PM
so it was a law that got him fired? :rofl:

money talks. he sucks and being a racist is bad for ratings (except in the south). that's why he got fired.

as a martyr, douchebag imus is lacking.

Kinda cool isn't it? They guy gets fired in a move that equates with pure capitalism, and pseudo conservatives still bitch.

Matt
April 12th, 2007, 11:56:28 PM
Thought police and the politically correct are rearing the ugly heads.
..Imus is an idiot. As a diehard Stern fan I always hated Imus. However, getting pounced upon and finally fired for saying a stupid and idiotic statemant is wrong.
Anyone remember freedom of speech? If you diagree with someone debate them. Pussy libs now whine, cry, make new laws against ideas they disagree with and then pretend they are holier than thou. Get a backbone and join the debate dont outlaw it. (range mods included)
I love it when people I diagree with spout off. Rosie, Hillary, shiv and shep, the more they talk the more they make my point. Rosie everyday spouting how America sucks, caused 911, and how we murdered a billion people in Iraq shows the average working stiff how loony the left is. The more she spews the better. Should we kick her off the air for being an idiot? hell no.

I disagree with your assessment of "pussy liberals", but the thought police statement is certainly true.

Matt
April 12th, 2007, 11:58:29 PM
so it was a law that got him fired? :rofl:

money talks. he sucks and being a racist is bad for ratings (except in the south). that's why he got fired.

as a martyr, douchebag imus is lacking.

Regardless of the right or wrong in the end of this, I don't think
it's all that unfair to consider Don Imus a patsy and the victim of a witch hunt. For better or worse.

Green Lantern
April 13th, 2007, 6:29:33 AM
Kinda cool isn't it? They guy gets fired in a move that equates with pure capitalism, and pseudo conservatives still bitch.

ouch.

I hate when logic bites back.

г
April 13th, 2007, 8:06:56 AM
Kinda cool isn't it? They guy gets fired in a move that equates with pure capitalism, and pseudo conservatives still bitch.

Probably because 'pseudo-conservatives' can't tell the difference between shit and shinola.

http://www.freshwidow.com/bradscomix/images/shit_shinola1.jpg

pmoon6
April 13th, 2007, 8:25:58 AM
Yee haw. Get the shotgun and load up the pickup. Don't forget the confederate flag now.Since you're new here, I'll give you a heads up. I'm the resident redneck here. These other wannabes couldn't shine mah boots.

Pick-up truck - Check
Gun Rack - Check
Multiple Firearms -Check
Shoot the eye out of a hummin' bird at 100 paces - Check

I am lacking in several areas:

No Confederate flags since I was born and raised in the North, my ancestors fought on the side of the Union and 3 died in Andersonville.

Don't live in a trailer, but I do have a camper painted in camoflage.

I still have all mah teef.

notacon
April 13th, 2007, 10:59:46 AM
I love it when knucklehead conservatives bring the 1st amendment into a discussion since it illustrates their profound ignorance.

This is the first amendment to the Constitution:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

"Congress shall make no law"

Congress did not make a law preventing Imus from making his racist comments.

Imus was not arrested.

Imus was not charged with a crime.

There is NO violation of our first amendment rights...there is NO violation of "freedom of speech".

The promotion of using government to restrict our expression is solely in the realm of conservatives. They are the ones that are anxious to censor magazines...movies...TV shows and music.

When Janet Jackson exposed her nipple on national TV, the outcry was from the usual suspects...wacko right wing religious nuts.

Trying to blame "liberals" for Imus getting fired is laughable.

There is not a liberal withing a mile of the executive offices of CBS where the decision was made to can Imus.

Not a liberal within a mile of ANY of the executive offices of the corporations that decided to pull their advertising from his sad show.

Equally ignorant is trying to blame liberals for motorcycle helmet laws...smoking restriction laws...cellphone restriction laws etc...

These are all public safety matters...ALL regulated by the states. Helmet and cellphone laws are pushed by the insurance companies (again...no liberal is within a mile of their executive offices) because they know that they reduce accidents.

Smoking bans in public areas are a safety and annoyance issue for second hand smoke. No "thought police" there. Just good public health policy...again regulated by the states.

I never listened to Imus...I though he mumbled too much and I really never "got" his supposed humor.

I don't have an opinion on the correctness of his firing...I really don't give a shit.

But to blame "liberals" for this is completely insane and absurd. Any regulation of the airwaves has ALWAYS been pushed by conservatives who would like nothing more than for the government to regulate everything you read, hear or watch.

dasaybz
April 13th, 2007, 11:14:35 AM
I love it when knucklehead conservatives bring the 1st amendment into a discussion since it illustrates their profound ignorance.

This is the first amendment to the Constitution:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

"Congress shall make no law"

Congress did not make a law preventing Imus from making his racist comments.

Imus was not arrested.

Imus was not charged with a crime.

There is NO violation of our first amendment rights...there is NO violation of "freedom of speech".

The promotion of using government to restrict our expression is solely in the realm of conservatives. They are the ones that are anxious to censor magazines...movies...TV shows and music.

When Janet Jackson exposed her nipple on national TV, the outcry was from the usual suspects...wacko right wing religious nuts.

Trying to blame "liberals" for Imus getting fired is laughable.

There is not a liberal withing a mile of the executive offices of CBS where the decision was made to can Imus.

Not a liberal within a mile of ANY of the executive offices of the corporations that decided to pull their advertising from his sad show.

Equally ignorant is trying to blame liberals for motorcycle helmet laws...smoking restriction laws...cellphone restriction laws etc...

These are all public safety matters...ALL regulated by the states. Helmet and cellphone laws are pushed by the insurance companies (again...no liberal is within a mile of their executive offices) because they know that they reduce accidents.

Smoking bans in public areas are a safety and annoyance issue for second hand smoke. No "thought police" there. Just good public health policy...again regulated by the states.

I never listened to Imus...I though he mumbled too much and I really never "got" his supposed humor.

I don't have an opinion on the correctness of his firing...I really don't give a shit.

But to blame "liberals" for this is completely insane and absurd. Any regulation of the airwaves has ALWAYS been pushed by conservatives who would like nothing more than for the government to regulate everything you read, hear or watch.
Nice post man.

The liberals didn't get Imus fired. This came down to NBC being politically correct. If they didn't fire him, they would catch so much shit it wouldn't be funny.

Crinoline
April 13th, 2007, 11:19:36 AM
I love it when knucklehead conservatives bring the 1st amendment into a discussion since it illustrates their profound ignorance.

This is the first amendment to the Constitution:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

"Congress shall make no law"

Congress did not make a law preventing Imus from making his racist comments.

Imus was not arrested.

Imus was not charged with a crime.

There is NO violation of our first amendment rights...there is NO violation of "freedom of speech".

The promotion of using government to restrict our expression is solely in the realm of conservatives. They are the ones that are anxious to censor magazines...movies...TV shows and music.

When Janet Jackson exposed her nipple on national TV, the outcry was from the usual suspects...wacko right wing religious nuts.

Trying to blame "liberals" for Imus getting fired is laughable.

There is not a liberal withing a mile of the executive offices of CBS where the decision was made to can Imus.

Not a liberal within a mile of ANY of the executive offices of the corporations that decided to pull their advertising from his sad show.

Equally ignorant is trying to blame liberals for motorcycle helmet laws...smoking restriction laws...cellphone restriction laws etc...

These are all public safety matters...ALL regulated by the states. Helmet and cellphone laws are pushed by the insurance companies (again...no liberal is within a mile of their executive offices) because they know that they reduce accidents.

Smoking bans in public areas are a safety and annoyance issue for second hand smoke. No "thought police" there. Just good public health policy...again regulated by the states.

I never listened to Imus...I though he mumbled too much and I really never "got" his supposed humor.

I don't have an opinion on the correctness of his firing...I really don't give a shit.

But to blame "liberals" for this is completely insane and absurd. Any regulation of the airwaves has ALWAYS been pushed by conservatives who would like nothing more than for the government to regulate everything you read, hear or watch.


I agree with just about everything cepting the last statement. Libs have done their fair share of trying to regulate what you read, hear or watch. No one side has a monopoly on this.

nehemiah
April 13th, 2007, 11:22:29 AM
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IUFYxEgZllk"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IUFYxEgZllk" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

ckg68
April 13th, 2007, 11:44:04 AM
I agree with just about everything cepting the last statement. Libs have done their fair share of trying to regulate what you read, hear or watch. No one side has a monopoly on this.

Maybe not,but those on the right have a bit bigger platform to pound away day after day with their takes,no matter how :bs: the take is. And it's magnified more in this country,which is still somewhat puritanical in matters sex(or at least talking about it). Sure,we can show you all the violent stuff you can handle....but something of a sexual nature? Shove it back into the closet...it's dirty,immoral and blah blah blah!

notacon
April 13th, 2007, 1:36:12 PM
I agree with just about everything cepting the last statement. Libs have done their fair share of trying to regulate what you read, hear or watch. No one side has a monopoly on this.

You may find an isolated incident where liberals attempt to regulate morality on the airwaves...but it is nowhere even CLOSE to what the conservatives have.

Please give me a solid example of what you are talking about.

I can give you literally thousands from the conservative side.

uppy
April 13th, 2007, 5:37:57 PM
You may find an isolated incident where liberals attempt to regulate morality on the airwaves...but it is nowhere even CLOSE to what the conservatives have.

Please give me a solid example of what you are talking about.

I can give you literally thousands from the conservative side.

lets hear a few ...notacon

shiva2999
April 13th, 2007, 5:41:09 PM
You're way more pc than I am uppy.

So is Gilly.

I don't know WTF you guys are whining about.

unklechucky
April 13th, 2007, 6:15:56 PM
In reference to Rosie, The View will go down the tubes, the way of the Imus show. No need to censor her, she hasn't crossed the line, buit her mouth will bring the show down....trust me.

г
April 13th, 2007, 6:25:29 PM
LOL, Chuckie watches The View

shiva2999
April 13th, 2007, 6:29:09 PM
No way the View goes down.

Rosie is rescuing her reputation with her courage in exposing the 9/11 bullshit.

Let me ask you a question chucky.

If Al Qaeda actually is a creation and tool of the US and 9/11 was a US intelligence black-op, would you care?

Or would you think they were justified for the good of the country and all that?

Green Lantern
April 13th, 2007, 7:27:27 PM
motorcycle riders, cell phone users, smokers, legal immigrants, parents, stern before sirius, duke lacross players, people who earn alot of money

Imus?

unklechucky
April 13th, 2007, 7:33:49 PM
No way the View goes down.

Rosie is rescuing her reputation with her courage in exposing the 9/11 bullshit.

Let me ask you a question chucky.

If Al Qaeda actually is a creation and tool of the US and 9/11 was a US intelligence black-op, would you care?

Or would you think they were justified for the good of the country and all that?


I would care. Husein was tried for murdering his own people. If this administration were reponsible for Al Qaeda and 9/11, they would be no different from Hussein.

That said, I've seen nothing that would come close to that even being the case. The only thing I've seen is merely propaganda from extremists.

notacon
April 14th, 2007, 9:39:16 AM
lets hear a few ...notacon

Here are just a few...

Christian Right complaints result in laws against “indecency”.

House Passes Indecency Bill (http://www.christianpost.com/article/20060608/5943_House_Passes_Indecency_Bill.htm)


While the bill will have many implications, its biggest impact will be felt among media giants that violate FCC standards on broadcasting. The bill increases to $325,000 the per-incident fine the FCC can impost on license for broadcasting indecent or obscene material – a tenfold increase from the current maximum fine, which is $32,500.

Pro-family groups celebrated the bill’s passage, calling it a “major victory for American families.”

“Finally, broadcasters will be held financially responsible for the filthy content they transmit,” said Lanier Swann, Director of Government Relations for Concerned Women for America. “This victory belongs to the citizens and grassroots organizations who have taken a stand for families by insisting that senators heed their demand for clean airwaves.”

anet Jackson’s infamous “wardrobe malfunction” during the 2004 Super Bowl halftime show had prompted a wave of Christian conservative groups to prompt both chambers of Congress in raising the ante for broadcast giants. Some groups, like the Washington-based Family Research Council, placed broadcast decency as one of its top agendas for 2005 and 2006.


Christian Right GOP’ers have infiltrated government agencies so they could instill their brand of “morality” on us all by controlling the FCC

FCC Hires Conservative Indecency Critic (http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001010563)


The Federal Communications Commission has hired as an advisor an anti-pornography activist and former lobbyist for groups that push for Christian precepts in public policy. The move may herald a reinvigorated campaign against broadcast indecency and bring renewed pressure on cable to reconsider its racy offerings.

Penny Nance, until recently a board member of Concerned Women for America, is working as a special advisor in the FCC’s Office of Strategic Planning and Policy Analysis, said aides to FCC Chairman Kevin Martin.

The strategic planning office helps develop agency policy. Concerned Women for America describes its mission as “helping…to bring Biblical principles into all levels of public policy.” In recent weeks Nance, a longtime supporter, stepped down from the organization’s board, said an official with the Washington, D.C.-based group.


“… to bring Biblical principles into all levels of public policy” HUH?!?!?!

How about stores that will not sell Playboy because of pressure from conservative Christian pressure groups…

Contractual Clause Leads to Removal of Porn from Texas 7-Eleven Store ( http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/3/232004d.asp)


A 7-Eleven convenience store in Texas has agreed to pull pornographic magazines from its shelves after being contacted by a legal firm that seeks to protect individuals' religious freedoms.

It was back in 1982 when a Christian businessman sold property to 7-Eleven, Inc., for a store in Fort Worth. The contract included a restrictive covenant which stated that the property could never be used for the sale or display of any obscene material.

Recently, the Christian businessman discovered that pornographic magazines were being sold at the store. Attorneys with Liberty Legal Institute intervened and, as attorney Hiram Sasser says, the offensive material was soon removed from the store's shelves.

"Here all this time has passed, and the next thing you know, they started selling Playboy in the 7-Eleven store -- so we contacted 7-Eleven," the LLI spokesman explains. "They're very willing to cooperate and remove all the pornography [from] the store, never to allow pornography in that store again."


Playboy may be many different things…but pornography it is not!

Of course by whatever definition they come up with of “pornography” they certainly don’t want anyone to watch it!

Conservatives Targeting Hotels to Eliminate Choice for Others (http://atheism.about.com/b/a/258105.htm)


Conservative Christians really don't like pornography - and they don't like anything that is even remotely similar to pornography. This is why thirteen conservative groups have joined forces to pressure hotels in America to stop offering adult movies to their customers. It's not enough for conservative Christians to refuse to watch sexual material; they want to stop everyone else from doing so as well.

I doubt that anyone would care if they simply chose to avoid adult entertainment, by why do they want to deny everyone else the ability to make the same choice, much less a different choice? Why should everyone else in the nation have to abide by their religious rules and standards?

From CNN…

Though porn is now cheaply and readily accessible on the Internet, and through many other outlets, the activists chose to target the hotel industry in part because of the well-known brands of corporations that cater to family vacationers as well as business travelers. “These are places that you take your family -- these are respectable institutions,” said Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council. “Anything that brings porn into the mainstream is a concern. It just desensitizes people.”


The biggest "thought police" groups are Ultra-conservative Christian Right Wing Wacko organizations that are part and parcel of the GOP party.

They want to control EVERYTHING that EVERYONE watches...hears or reads.

г
April 14th, 2007, 9:42:19 AM
Didn't Charton Heston once say 'They'll have to pull my Hustler and Super Slurpee from my COLD DEAD HANDS' ?

Green Lantern
April 14th, 2007, 10:06:38 AM
Yah Butt!

uppy
April 14th, 2007, 10:28:42 AM
You're way more pc than I am uppy.

So is Gilly.

I don't know WTF you guys are whining about.

To be honest with you Shiva,I don't think you are PC or liberal.

If not for the 9/11 theories and anti-war stance I would say you where

a conservative.

г
April 14th, 2007, 10:42:56 AM
Most Canadians are centrists supporting a free market with a few tweaks like healthcare, etc. Individual/privacy rights are probably bigger up here, for example credit card companies can't share customer address/personal info with vendors by law, wiretaps by law enforcement are not as liberal as they are in the US etc. etc.

uppy
April 14th, 2007, 10:47:12 AM
That sounds about right ....from what I have seen D3.

I can't call you north left boys moonbats...that honor is reserved for our

lefties

35Pete
April 14th, 2007, 12:35:42 PM
Here are just a few...

Christian Right complaints result in laws against “indecency”.

House Passes Indecency Bill (http://www.christianpost.com/article/20060608/5943_House_Passes_Indecency_Bill.htm)



Christian Right GOP’ers have infiltrated government agencies so they could instill their brand of “morality” on us all by controlling the FCC

FCC Hires Conservative Indecency Critic (http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001010563)



“… to bring Biblical principles into all levels of public policy” HUH?!?!?!

How about stores that will not sell Playboy because of pressure from conservative Christian pressure groups…

Contractual Clause Leads to Removal of Porn from Texas 7-Eleven Store ( http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/3/232004d.asp)



Playboy may be many different things…but pornography it is not!

Of course by whatever definition they come up with of “pornography” they certainly don’t want anyone to watch it!

Conservatives Targeting Hotels to Eliminate Choice for Others (http://atheism.about.com/b/a/258105.htm)



The biggest "thought police" groups are Ultra-conservative Christian Right Wing Wacko organizations that are part and parcel of the GOP party.

They want to control EVERYTHING that EVERYONE watches...hears or reads.

Tell you what. If you are so incensed by this stuff, as you should be, then join me in universal condemnation of both sides for engaging in this nonsense.

Will you do this?

JimKelly12203
April 14th, 2007, 1:29:58 PM
The whole thing is a goddamn media circus. Having listened to a little Imus for about five years now i must say that these comments are NOT even close to the worst he's ever made. Why make a big stink about it now? I think Imus was offensive as often as he was funny and i think i agreed with him politically as often as i disagreed with him. So i really don't give a damn either way but this is clearly a witch hunt.

It's all BS. This is no different from any other nonsense story the media has ramed down our throats. Terry Schivo, the runaway bride, Anna Nicole Smith (pre and post death), Lacy Peterson, Duke Lacross, hot blonde Alabama high school senior chick dissapears in Aruba, etc... etc... It's goo for our brains so we aren't thinking about relevant issues.

For the last two days Imus has dominated the sports media as well as the political media. Hardball was 85% Imus these past few days. Ditto every other show politically minded show. This shit put the Circus in Bread and Circuses. It's a national distraction from relevant and serious issues.

Two Rage Against the Machine quotes that i think are aplicable;

"The main attraction, distraction"

"They load the clip in Omnicolor, said they pack the 9, they fire it at prime time. Like sleeping gas every home was like Alcatraz and Mother#@$%#$s lost their minds"

notacon
April 15th, 2007, 10:44:36 AM
Tell you what. If you are so incensed by this stuff, as you should be, then join me in universal condemnation of both sides for engaging in this nonsense.

Will you do this?

You did this in another thread Pete and it does not apply here either.

I'll repeat what I said...

Your constant attempt to paint both parties (or political philosophies) into the same evil on every issue is absurd.

On THIS issue...an attempt at censorship and controlling what we watch, hear and read...is almost exclusively from the political right.

Try and play the "they all do it card" if you wish...it just makes YOU look like the political partisan hack trying to cover for one party (or political philosophy) over another.

But, just to make you happy...if anyone can supply ANY instance that liberals have attempted to coerce the government to suppress the media...I will condemn it. (or at least discuss if it is the same as what conservatives have been trying to do for centuries).

JLB
April 15th, 2007, 10:47:17 AM
To be honest with you Shiva,I don't think you are PC or liberal.

If not for the 9/11 theories and anti-war stance I would say you where

a conservative.

Your trying to hurt him!:D

Green Lantern
April 15th, 2007, 10:49:45 AM
To be honest with you Shiva,I don't think you are PC or liberal.

If not for the 9/11 theories and anti-war stance I would say you where

a conservative.

Your trying to hurt him!:D

Pretty sure Shiva sees himself as the charioteer, not either one of the horses.

shiva2999
April 15th, 2007, 12:55:01 PM
My agenda is smart vs stupid, truth vs bullshit and justice vs injustice.

Bitches.

Green Lantern
April 15th, 2007, 1:15:57 PM
My agenda is smart vs stupid, truth vs bullshit and justice vs injustice.

Bitches.

After all your years of research, you still see the world only as a choice of two options?