PDA

View Full Version : republicans love gay porn and male prostitutes


nehemiah
March 8th, 2007, 2:02:08 PM
o. mah. gawd.

I don’t know if David Horowitz knew Cpl. Matt Sanchez was once a gay porn star and male prostitute when he introduced him to me at last weekend’s CPAC. But he did know that Sanchez was an eager yes-man, and a supposed victim of the campus PC thuggery Horowitz has made a career out of decrying.

As Horowitz played cardiologist, ranting to me about how each leftist “has hatred in his heart” and how members of the New Left to which he once belonged had “treason in their hearts,” Sanchez stood faithfully by his side, muttering encouragement. “That’s right. That’s right,” Sanchez would say, almost on cue. Whenever I spoke, Sanchez would mumble something under his breath like, “That’s such a lie! Omigod!” or “See! Liberals are hateful.”

Horowitz probably discovered Sanchez after the ex-Marine appeared on Hannity & Colmes alleging that while studying at Columbia University, he was called a “baby-killer” by members of that school’s International Socialist Organization. This alleged episode, which was investigated by Columbia but never confirmed, also earned Sanchez a spot on the O’Reilly Factor.

For his supposed courage in the face of liberal cruelty, Cpl. Sanchez was presented with the Jeanne Kirpatrick Academic Freedom Award at this year’s CPAC. Sanchez was the perfect vehicle for the conservative movement’s ongoing attempt to wrap itself in the uniform, and to heap resentment on liberals for their supposed anti-military bias.

Soon, Sanchez was rubbing shoulders with the likes of Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin. Malkin posted pictures of herself beside the corporal on her blog. Sanchez was clad in full military regalia and Malkin wore a big smile. But Malkin is not smiling anymore. Like so many of Sanchez’s boosters, she was mugged by reality.

As several gay blogs revealed late yesterday, Corporal Sanchez was known during his halcyon days as Rod Majors, a majorly well-endowed gay porn star. (Photos of Corp. Sanchez aka Rod Majors in action can be viewed here. I warn you, this link is NOT to be clicked on if you have minors around or if you’re in a crowded workplace). According to Tom Bacchus, Sanchez was also a $200-an-hour male prostitute who advertised himself (here) as an “excellent top.”
http://maxblumenthal.com/archives/39

:rofl:

nehemiah
March 8th, 2007, 2:04:28 PM
cpl matt is online at --> http://mattsanchez.blogspot.com/

interview w/ him here --> http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2007/03/matt-sanchez-responds-sort-of.html

Meathead
March 8th, 2007, 2:04:33 PM
now if republicans like male chimp sex we will have a real story

rob on the job
March 8th, 2007, 2:07:11 PM
It takes a real Democrat to follow the trail leading to gay porn and male prostitutes.

It's like you guys have a nose for it or something.

nehemiah
March 8th, 2007, 2:08:42 PM
dirty sanchez!

K-Gun
March 8th, 2007, 2:19:48 PM
It takes a real Democrat to follow the trail leading to gay porn and male prostitutes.

It's like you guys have a nose for it or something.

:rofl: According to Sanchez, liberalism is at fault for his gay porn career.



"I don’t like porn, it reduces the mind, flattens the soul. That’s not hypocrisy talking, that’s experience. If I started off with liberal leanings, being on a gay porn set should have been heaven. In porn, everything taboo is trivialized and everything trivial is projected. How does a conservative trace his roots to such distasteful beginnings? Like all followers of a cult, it’s tough to figure out when you stopped believing in the party-line, but I can tell you that by the time I finished my summer tour of the major studios, I was pretty disgusted with myself."

ckg68
March 8th, 2007, 2:26:53 PM
Sorry,Matt,you made the choice to do gay porn. "Liberalism" had nothing whatsoever to do it.

You've now entered the world inhabited by Jeff Gannon and Ted Haggard: being part of a political party that doesn't like gays,yet being gay(or getting caught doing gay acts) yourself.

nehemiah
March 8th, 2007, 2:36:41 PM
here's my fave from the interview:

JMG: Do you consider yourself gay?
SANCHEZ: Boyfriends: 0 Fiance: 2 Wife: 1. I'd say I'm pretty bad at being gay.

he was doing gay porn and getting money for ****ing gay men........ but he's not gay?

:rofl: that is ****ing priceless! seriously.

JLB
March 8th, 2007, 2:40:58 PM
http://www.socalsoccer.com/forum/image.php?u=1042&dateline=2005

rob on the job
March 8th, 2007, 2:42:11 PM
... he was doing gay porn and getting money for ****ing gay men........ but he's not gay? ....

Clearly, the man is a warrior.

Meathead
March 8th, 2007, 3:03:09 PM
its only gay if youre the bottom

now bend over

Matt
March 8th, 2007, 4:05:50 PM
How is a thread title like this whatsoever appropriate or necessary?

JLB
March 8th, 2007, 4:08:59 PM
Don't forget to set your clocks ahead one hour this saturday or you'll be late for church sunday.

rob on the job
March 8th, 2007, 4:11:41 PM
How is a thread title like this whatsoever appropriate or necessary?

Welcome to the Range reality, Hero.

Those on the Left like to grab anything to embarass the Right, forcibly pushing the Right to the ground, twisting their arm behind their back, then jumping behind them and repeatedly sticking it in and out and in and out until the whole thing climaxes.

The embarassing news item, I mean.

nehemiah
March 8th, 2007, 4:17:29 PM
How is a thread title like this whatsoever appropriate or necessary?what is wrong with it?

Matt
March 8th, 2007, 4:25:13 PM
what is wrong with it?

It claims something that can be interpreted a bunch of ways, is based on indirect innuendo, implies something unprovable ("love"?), shows little class, does not find sparking actual conversation as it's primary goal and without all of those things, would still be a boorish, classless and outright rude description of a particular individual or group of individuals that is not needed to communicate what you wanted to in this piece.

nehemiah
March 8th, 2007, 4:27:43 PM
It claims something that can be interpreted a bunch of ways, is based on indirect innuendo, implies something unprovable ("love"?), shows little class, does not find sparking actual conversation as it's primary goal and without all of those things, would still be a boorish, classless and outright rude description of a particular individual or group of individuals that is not needed to communicate what you wanted to in this piece.republicans keep giving awards and cushy jobs to gay porn stars and male prostitutes. i consider that a love affair to make any patriots fan with a mancrush on brady proud.

sorry that you're offended. :rolleyes:

Matt
March 8th, 2007, 4:31:25 PM
republicans keep giving awards and cushy jobs to gay porn stars and male prostitutes. i consider that a love affair to make any patriots fan with a mancrush on brady proud.

sorry that you're offended. :rolleyes:

Apology accepted.

I see that the little 3-word monicker under your username accurately explains the two blue icons directly underneath it.

nehemiah
March 8th, 2007, 4:35:56 PM
Apology accepted.

I see that the little 3-word monicker under your username accurately explains the two blue icons directly underneath it.well, that one is incomprehensible to me.

:dunno:

care to explain or stick w/ the pithiness?

K-Gun
March 8th, 2007, 4:51:36 PM
LIBERAL BIAS!!!!!!!!

K-Gun
March 8th, 2007, 4:53:29 PM
It claims something that can be interpreted a bunch of ways, is based on indirect innuendo, implies something unprovable ("love"?), shows little class, does not find sparking actual conversation as it's primary goal and without all of those things, would still be a boorish, classless and outright rude description of a particular individual or group of individuals that is not needed to communicate what you wanted to in this piece.

You're right, it is VERY classless and outright rude to call gay people Republicans.

JLB
March 8th, 2007, 4:56:01 PM
Don't forget to set your clocks ahead one hour this saturday or you'll be late for church sunday.



:partysmilies: :partysmilies:

One hour closer to the season!!

nehemiah
March 8th, 2007, 5:14:17 PM
here's a photo of the republican man-whore and a blonde tranny.

nehemiah
March 8th, 2007, 5:16:15 PM
btw, his movies include:
The Best of Dave Logan (1999) (V)
Touched by an Anal (1997) (V) :rofl:
Jawbreaker (1995) (V) .... Convict 3
All About Last Night (1995) (V)
Built Tough (1995) (V) .... Rod
Beat Off Frenzy (1994) (V)
Bi-conflict (1994) (V) .... David
Conflict of Interest (1994) (V) .... Rod
Idol Country (1994) (V) .... First guy in barn
Laid to Order (1994) (V) .... Third guy on couch :guy:
Lunch Hour 2: Sweating Grease (1994) (V) .... Garage thief
Man to Men (1994) (V) .... No-nonsense top
Secret Sex 2: The Sex Radicals (1994) (V)
Montreal Men :canada: (1993) (V) (as Pierre LaBranche) .... First hustler
Woody's (1993) (V) .... Rod
Call of the Wild (1992) (V) (as Pierre LaBranche)
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0538273/

rob on the job
March 8th, 2007, 5:18:18 PM
LIBERAL BIAS!!!!!!!!

Redundant.

JLB
March 8th, 2007, 5:18:42 PM
You're right, it is VERY classless and outright rude to call gay people Republicans.


There are gay Republicans and Democrats no?

Matt
March 8th, 2007, 7:46:03 PM
well, that one is incomprehensible to me.

:dunno:

care to explain or stick w/ the pithiness?

It wouldn't really matter.

Green Lantern
March 8th, 2007, 8:27:35 PM
There are gay Republicans and Democrats no?

HARRISONBURG: Charles "Benny" Neal, candidate for Rockingham County Circuit Court clerk, wants voters to know the naked truth about his past. Twenty-eight years ago, he posed in the buff for Playgirl magazine.

"I am not going to run from this," Neal said. "I am going to run with it." Neal, 49, figured his past would be exposed anyway after his own Internet search turned up a reference to his failed attempt to parlay the modelling job into a music career. So why not come forward from the start?

Good call, said James Madison University political science professor Bob Roberts, who predicted some voters will give Neal credit for confronting the issue head-on. His advice to Neal: Take a humorous approach.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/NEWS/World/The_United_States/Virginia_candidate_will_not_hide_nude_photos_from_ past/articleshow/1738527.cms

Meathead
March 9th, 2007, 6:27:54 PM
is based on indirect innuendo, implies something unprovable, shows little class, does not find sparking actual conversation as it's primary goal and a boorish, classless and outright rude description of a particular individual or group of individuals
you say that like its a bad thing