PDA

View Full Version : Ha ha ha! Fox News chastises it's people over Insight Obama/madrassas article


shiva2999
January 29th, 2007, 1:10:21 PM
Man!

Things have to be pretty bad when FOX and the Moonie Times start ragging on their own people for being stupid and biased...

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/29/us/politics/29media.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

Feeding Frenzy for a Big Story, Even if It’s False

DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK
Published: January 29, 2007

WASHINGTON, Jan. 28 — Jeffrey T. Kuhner, whose Web site published the first anonymous smear of the 2008 presidential race, is hardly the only editor who will not reveal his reporters’ sources. What sets him apart is that he will not even disclose the names of his reporters.

But their anonymity has not stopped them from making an impact. In the last two weeks, Mr. Kuhner’s Web site, Insight, the last remnant of a defunct conservative print magazine owned by the Unification Church led by the Rev. Sun Myung Moon, was able to set off a wave of television commentary, talk-radio chatter, official denials, investigations by journalists around the globe and news media self-analysis that has lasted 11 days and counting.

The controversy started with a quickly discredited Jan. 17 article on the Insight Web site asserting that the presidential campaign of Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton was preparing an accusation that her rival, Senator Barack Obama, had covered up a brief period he had spent in an Islamic religious school in Indonesia when he was 6.

(Other news organizations have confirmed Mr. Obama’s descriptions of the school as a secular public school. Both senators have denounced the report, and there is no evidence that Mrs. Clinton’s campaign planned to spread those accusations.)

...and...

The Washington Times, which is also owned by the Unification Church, but operates separately from the Web site, quickly disavowed the article. Its national editor sent an e-mail message to staff members under the heading “Insight Strikes Again” telling them to “make sure that no mention of any Insight story” appeared in the paper, and another e-mail message to its Congressional correspondent instructing him to clarify to Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama that The Washington Times had nothing to do with the article on the Web site.

“Some of the editors here get annoyed when Insight is identified as a publication of The Washington Times,” said Wesley Pruden, editor in chief of The Washington Times.

And in an interview, John Moody, a senior vice president at Fox News, said its commentators had erred by citing the Clinton-Obama report. “The hosts violated one of our general rules, which is know what you are talking about,” Mr. Moody said. “They reported information from a publication whose accuracy we didn’t know.”

...more...


Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!

rob on the job
January 29th, 2007, 1:12:42 PM
Dumb, certainly. The "source who asked to remain anonymous" is a bane of contemporary journalism.

But when was the last time you remember the Leftist Media disciplining their out-of-control so-called "reporters"?

dasaybz
January 29th, 2007, 1:13:32 PM
I really hate watching the news. I would much rather surf the web for real newsworthy stories and form my own opinion.

ddpderek
January 29th, 2007, 1:23:21 PM
Dumb, certainly. The "source who asked to remain anonymous" is a bane of contemporary journalism.

But when was the last time you remember the Leftist Media disciplining their out-of-control so-called "reporters"?

What reporters do you speak of?

CBS got ran hard as did Rather when they went with the Wbush draft dodging story as they didnt have good enough sources and they baded for it.

Also if your speaking of pundits such as a show like hard ball both sides get away with a lot as it is opinion.

Seeing FOXNEWS admit wrong is a miracle but its not like they wont be bashing obama is a few months any way.

rob on the job
January 29th, 2007, 1:33:27 PM
What reporters do you speak of?

CBS got ran hard as did Rather when they went with the Wbush draft dodging story as they didnt have good enough sources and they baded for it.

Also if your speaking of pundits such as a show like hard ball both sides get away with a lot as it is opinion. ....

I was referring more to the low-profile reporters, editors and producers who are supposedly producing "objective" copy, than I was the columnists and TV pundits and talk-show hosts.

micknaboz
January 29th, 2007, 1:38:54 PM
Dumb, certainly. The "source who asked to remain anonymous" is a bane of contemporary journalism.

But when was the last time you remember the Leftist Media disciplining their out-of-control so-called "reporters"?

OK I'll bite. What specific leftist media are you referring to, and cite me just one instance of a similiar situation on the "leftist media" not disciplining someone for something similiar.

rob on the job
January 29th, 2007, 2:01:38 PM
OK I'll bite. What specific leftist media are you referring to, and cite me just one instance of a similiar situation on the "leftist media" not disciplining someone for something similiar.

OK, New York Times & Washington Post for the fabricated story from the Kerry campaign in October 2004, on the "massive theft" of weapons from an Iraqi storage depot.

Or the New York Times for its complicity in the 60 Minutes/Dan Rather piece on Bush's Air National Guard service.

Or David Gregory of NBC for his slanted coverage of the White House.

et al et al et al et al .........

JLB
January 29th, 2007, 2:16:01 PM
OK, New York Times & Washington Post for the fabricated story from the Kerry campaign in October 2004, on the "massive theft" of weapons from an Iraqi storage depot.

Or the New York Times for its complicity in the 60 Minutes/Dan Rather piece on Bush's Air National Guard service.

Or David Gregory of NBC for his slanted coverage of the White House.

et al et al et al et al .........

To easy lol.

shiva2999
January 29th, 2007, 2:17:44 PM
To easy lol.

Just as easy as posting that Insight article in the first place, huh?

micknaboz
January 29th, 2007, 3:25:42 PM
OK, New York Times & Washington Post for the fabricated story from the Kerry campaign in October 2004, on the "massive theft" of weapons from an Iraqi storage depot.

Or the New York Times for its complicity in the 60 Minutes/Dan Rather piece on Bush's Air National Guard service.

Or David Gregory of NBC for his slanted coverage of the White House.

et al et al et al et al .........

I dont recall the Kerry campaign story, any links?

The story Rather did was right in its facts, just not the source. But hey who cares about facts.And if you cant recall, Rather lost his job over it.

Cuz David Gregory actually does his job as a journalist and asks the tough questions, he's slanted? Riiiiiighhtt........I'm surprised you didnt toss in the latest "emboldening the enemy " meme.