View Full Version : Let's watch closely tonight.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 6:34:19 PM
for years i have heard the leafs get the benefit of calls from the referee's. I have always found this baffling considering they have never won anything and the closest they ever got was marred by a missed call by Kerry fraser. (they may have lost anway, but still).
so let's just watch this game tonight and see if the refs are completely one sided towards the leafs.
it should be interesting to see.
beTough54
January 11th, 2007, 6:44:52 PM
Lots of threads about the game already, including one started by you and even a thread specifically about officiating when it comes to the Leafs.
I don't watch games closely to watch officials anyways. I watch to see the Sabres beat the Leafs over and over again.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 6:51:23 PM
thats cool man, but if we keep track of this specific game we can actually see if it is happening every single time like people suggest. i will do it myself i don't care. i will post every single penalty with a little write up. other can give me there opinion on it.
Bay Side
January 11th, 2007, 6:53:13 PM
Queefs are done!!
Denverbillsfan
January 11th, 2007, 6:57:35 PM
Bduff don't tell me last game the Sabres didn't get a few bullshit calls. Homerism doesn't suit you well.
beTough54
January 11th, 2007, 7:03:58 PM
First bad call of the game: Robitaille's suit. Ugh.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 7:07:57 PM
Bduff don't tell me last game the Sabres didn't get a few bullshit calls. Homerism doesn't suit you well.
honestly man, i didn't see last game at all. You can ask anyone, it was actually only the 3rd game i missed all year. that why i started this thread, because soem guys said "every" game the leafs play the refs try and make them win.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 7:14:58 PM
penalty #1: Battaglia for holding. easy call, no doubter.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 7:16:39 PM
penalty #2: cross check on Mccabe. Probably a penalty, nice little flop by briere too
beTough54
January 11th, 2007, 7:17:20 PM
That was interference as well as cross checking. Not even close.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 7:19:56 PM
haha, it was a penalty for sure. but it was no interference, don't think ya know the rules boss.
beTough54
January 11th, 2007, 7:23:14 PM
Interference is hitting a player who doesn't have possession of the puck. Briere didn't have the puck.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 7:27:13 PM
only 2 penalties so far, pretty well called game.
Denverbillsfan
January 11th, 2007, 7:44:03 PM
I saw two trips that were not called in the beginning of the game. Blatant stick between the legs.
Can't deny that Bduff.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 7:46:19 PM
the one on mccabe? yeah it was close, there was a hit from behind by the sabres also early in the game. but the refs are choosing to let them play a bit.
Denverbillsfan
January 11th, 2007, 7:57:48 PM
I noticed that after some calls were not called.
Sabres244
January 11th, 2007, 7:58:37 PM
Hits: Buffalo 17
Toronto 10
just pointing it out
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 7:59:10 PM
ok, but the leafs have yet to have a PP so you can't complain. and you had a 5-3. 2nd period starting
Denverbillsfan
January 11th, 2007, 8:03:26 PM
I am personally terrified when we get a PP. Either we look like crap or we give up a shorthanded goal.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:04:11 PM
peanlty #3. spacek for high-stick. easy call
beTough54
January 11th, 2007, 8:04:42 PM
Nice dive by the Leafs to draw that one.
beTough54
January 11th, 2007, 8:05:11 PM
He never hit him bduff, AND the Leaf grabbed the stick right before hand.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:05:50 PM
dive? it hit him right in the face? your a fool.
peamlty #4. gaustad for a lazy hook. could have let it go maybe.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:06:44 PM
He never hit him bduff, AND the Leaf grabbed the stick right before hand.
your a joke, i saw the replay twice it hit ondrus right in the face, if you can't be honest get ou tof here.
JLB
January 11th, 2007, 8:07:34 PM
Lets just beat the crap out of these guys lets go boys!!!
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:09:18 PM
peanlty #5. battaglia for a hook. similar to gaustads, lazy
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:15:35 PM
let me get an opinion on this. do you guys think the puck was under raycroft and the whistle should have blown?
MLLE2383
January 11th, 2007, 8:20:08 PM
not even close, especially the way i've seen that being called as of late. Refs have not been blowing the whistle quickly in that situation, from what i've seen. It would have hit the fan had they blown the whistle.......
MLLE2383
January 11th, 2007, 8:21:45 PM
What do you have to say about that BDUFF??????????????
HORRIBLE HORRIBLE HORRIBLE CALL
Chalk one up for the Leafs.;......
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:21:54 PM
i agree micktko.
penalty #6. afinoganov for interference, looks like a great hit but with the new rules it is a penalty, i hate that. i thought it was a great play but it was the correct call.
beTough54
January 11th, 2007, 8:22:16 PM
Awful awful call on Maxim for daring to hit a Leaf. What a chickenshit call.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:22:43 PM
What do you have to say about that BDUFF??????????????
HORRIBLE HORRIBLE HORRIBLE CALL
Chalk one up for the Leafs.;......
man i hate the rule but if you know them it is definitely a penalty, stajan had yet to touch the puck and he nailed him. it sucks but it is the rule
ICRockets
January 11th, 2007, 8:23:21 PM
i agree micktko.
penalty #6. afinoganov for interference, looks like a great hit but with the new rules it is a penalty, i hate that. i thought it was a great play but it was the correct call.
If you agree that it's a bad call, then it can't be the right call.
At least make some damn sense when you try to keep up.
beTough54
January 11th, 2007, 8:23:32 PM
That was not a correct call at all. The "new rules" did not change interference at all, it was just a re-emphasis on calling actual infractions. That wasn't even close.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:23:35 PM
guys i totally agree but it the rule. you can't bash the refs for doing their jobs on obvious calls.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:24:27 PM
oh man, are you guys novice hockey viewers. that play has been called for 2 years, he has to touch the puck. wow.
MLLE2383
January 11th, 2007, 8:24:49 PM
Well i can't say i have a copy of the rule book, so i can't argue that point, but i don't like the call
We killed it anyway, thanks to spectacular saves by Marty!!!
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:25:16 PM
If you agree that it's a bad call, then it can't be the right call.
At least make some damn sense when you try to keep up.
it can be a bad rule and a correct call no?
MLLE2383
January 11th, 2007, 8:26:22 PM
it can be a bad rule and a correct call no?
Agreed
again we killed it so no harm
MLLE2383
January 11th, 2007, 8:27:06 PM
DIVE??????????
not a trip
maybe a hook..........still a dive
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:27:07 PM
peanlty #7. tripping on spacek, weak call. they missed that one boys. kubina kind of just bailed
beTough54
January 11th, 2007, 8:27:52 PM
Wow.
The Sabres have the reputation as divers???
TRIPLE P
January 11th, 2007, 8:29:08 PM
man i hate the rule but if you know them it is definitely a penalty, stajan had yet to touch the puck and he nailed him. it sucks but it is the rule
MAx had yet to touch the puck, stajan hit him.
ICRockets
January 11th, 2007, 8:29:15 PM
Wow.
The Sabres have the reputation as divers???
they can't call that one and you know it.
the refs love their jobs too much to call dives on the queefs.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:29:51 PM
lol, kubina scores. weak call leads to the goal boys, first to admit it right here.
ICRockets
January 11th, 2007, 8:29:57 PM
Damn It
TRIPLE P
January 11th, 2007, 8:30:15 PM
Lame BS goal for a lame BS team
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:30:34 PM
MAx had yet to touch the puck, stajan hit him.
dude, if your serious you do not understand the game
MLLE2383
January 11th, 2007, 8:30:36 PM
Horrible...................
TRIPLE P
January 11th, 2007, 8:32:34 PM
dude, if your serious you do not understand the game
Why was it Stajans puck to touch and not maxs? They both were going for it, were they not?
So...if two guys are going for one puck in one area they are bound to make contac.....if Max falls and Stajan stays on his feet who is the penalty on?
beTough54
January 11th, 2007, 8:34:07 PM
Why was it Stajans puck to touch and not maxs? They both were going for it, were they not?
So...if two guys are going for one puck in one area they are bound to make contac.....if Max falls and Stajan stays on his feet who is the penalty on?
Don't confuse him. I'd hate to force his life partner to clean up after his head explodes.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:36:12 PM
because it wasn't a loose puck it was a slow pass to stajan, he has to pick it off or wait for stajan to get it then take the man.
this is what i am talking about guys, the leafs have killed the sabres this period and you guys blame the refs. blame the sabres or credit the leafs.
Denverbillsfan
January 11th, 2007, 8:36:28 PM
What about the last shit call on Spacek. Chalk yet another one up for the leafs and this goes for a goal.
MLLE2383
January 11th, 2007, 8:36:49 PM
I'll credit the Leafs for outplaying us, but i blame the refs for the score being 2-1.....
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:38:55 PM
What about the last shit call on Spacek. Chalk yet another one up for the leafs and this goes for a goal.
dude i said it was a shit call. but if the leafs win this game all you will talk about is the refs instead of giving the leafs credit. i always give a team credit when they impress me on any given night.
MLLE2383
January 11th, 2007, 8:40:45 PM
dude i said it was a shit call. but if the leafs win this game all you will talk about is the refs instead of giving the leafs credit. i always give a team credit when they impress me on any given night.
Can't say the Leafs are impressive tonight.....
For a team to be impressive, they need to seriously outplay the opposition....
I'd say the Leafs outplayed us in the 2nd period
We still have the third, which is extremely unfortunate for Toronto
Denverbillsfan
January 11th, 2007, 8:41:00 PM
dude i said it was a shit call. but if the leafs win this game all you will talk about is the refs instead of giving the leafs credit. i always give a team credit when they impress me on any given night.
when I looked at the time it was way before the one on Spacek, that is why I added his too.
I am not taking credit away from the Leafs but when you get several bullcrap calls and then they lead to goals, that is another whole story.
TRIPLE P
January 11th, 2007, 8:43:06 PM
because it wasn't a loose puck it was a slow pass to stajan, he has to pick it off or wait for stajan to get it then take the man.
this is what i am talking about guys, the leafs have killed the sabres this period and you guys blame the refs. blame the sabres or credit the leafs.
You are 100% full of shit...it was a shot from the point, hit traffic in front, and DEREK ROY hit it with his backhand off the boards...
Not a "slow pass", not a penalty, nothing but bullshit... it was a loose puck. You must not understand the game.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:44:52 PM
lol, but you are only looking at it from your perspective. do you hear my going nuts? if was a homer like you guys here is what i would whine about.
1. vanek's goal. you guys would be saying the whistle should have blown
2. #38, paetch? brutal holding behind the net.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:45:40 PM
guys, they outshot them 15-3. it is not the ref's fault. this is hilarious
TRIPLE P
January 11th, 2007, 8:47:04 PM
lol....you've already been caught lying bDuff...well...lting or not knowing what the hell you're talking about...
Address my point about the "sloww pass" our player made to stajan
MLLE2383
January 11th, 2007, 8:47:21 PM
I definitely agree, people are always going to be biased to their team, but when there is substantial evidence to a call being made that should not have been a call, there can't be an argument
TRIPLE P
January 11th, 2007, 8:47:51 PM
guys, they outshot them 15-3. it is not the ref's fault. this is hilarious
They don't count shots when they determine who wins.....the goal you're up by was scored on a BS powerplay.....another bs powerplay.
MLLE2383
January 11th, 2007, 8:49:00 PM
hey bduff
yes shots on goal were 15-3, but how bout penalties called
Buffalo 4
Toronto 1
Teams get more SOG when they have a man advantage, nice try on that one though
ICRockets
January 11th, 2007, 8:49:04 PM
guys, they outshot them 15-3. it is not the ref's fault. this is hilarious
YOU started this thread to see if the refs give calls to the Leafs.
YOU said you were the first to admit the trip on Spacek was a bad call.
YOU said you were the first to admit it was the bad call that led to the goal.
Sorry, sport, but I guess I don't see why this thread has any point anymore. It's been proven, it's done. Move on.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:49:56 PM
lol....you've already been caught lying bDuff...well...lting or not knowing what the hell you're talking about...
Address my point about the "sloww pass" our player made to stajan
dude, i seriously thought it was a pass. man, i watch a lot of hockey, when i saw that hit i immediately thought penalty. it was a penalty, a shitty one but the correct call. you can't just hit guys anymore unless they have touched the puck . what max is supposed to there is reach for the puck not nail stajan, i don't agree with it but it was the correct call.
ICRockets
January 11th, 2007, 8:51:16 PM
dude, i seriously thought it was a pass. man, i watch a lot of hockey, when i saw that hit i immediately thought penalty. it was a penalty, a shitty one but the correct call. you can't just hit guys anymore unless they have touched the puck . what max is supposed to there is reach for the puck not nail stajan, i don't agree with it but it was the correct call.
WXP just gave you an accurate PBP of the "slow pass" and you still maintain that it was a bad call because you "seriously thought" something? Give it up, champ.
MLLE2383
January 11th, 2007, 8:51:26 PM
Sorry, sport, but I guess I don't see why this thread has any point anymore. It's been proven, it's done. Move on.
Great point.....i'm done with this thread as well
LETS GO BUFFALO!!!!!!
Final Score
Sabres 4
Queefs 2
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:51:48 PM
so you are telling me that one bad call out of #7 means the leafs are secretly trying to make the leafs win? wow, jesus guys. the call was bad but it was close, spacek did get his stick in there. I wouldn't have called it after i saw the replay but it happens fast out there, it looked like it could have been.
so you guys have determined that the NHL is fixed?
TRIPLE P
January 11th, 2007, 8:52:08 PM
dude, i seriously thought it was a pass. man, i watch a lot of hockey, when i saw that hit i immediately thought penalty. it was a penalty, a shitty one but the correct call. you can't just hit guys anymore unless they have touched the puck . what max is supposed to there is reach for the puck not nail stajan, i don't agree with it but it was the correct call.
But if it was a pass, it was a pass from a buffalo player....so then its interference on Stajan, not on max.
That or its a loose puck....also not a penalty.
You could have thougt it was a pass to stajan...but it wasn't. So it wasn't the correct call.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:52:34 PM
guys, i am telling to the call on max is crappy but it is the rule. god
ICRockets
January 11th, 2007, 8:53:03 PM
so you are telling me that one bad call out of #7 means the leafs are secretly trying to make the leafs win? wow, jesus guys. the call was bad but it was close, spacek did get his stick in there. I wouldn't have called it after i saw the replay but it happens fast out there, it looked like it could have been.
so you guys have determined that the NHL is fixed?
No, actually, based on who started the thread, and who's watching closely at this game, and who admitted a bad call is why the Leafs are ahead right now....you determined the NHL is fixed.
TRIPLE P
January 11th, 2007, 8:54:07 PM
And I'm not saying the refs are hceating, or the game is fixed, or even they knew.....
But the fact is of the 4 penalties, two were complete BS, one was a high stick after the leaf guy held the stick, and one was legit.
They missed on paetsch.
Regardless....if you start a thread about good or bad calls this is the kind of analysis you're gonna get....
TRIPLE P
January 11th, 2007, 8:54:23 PM
guys, i am telling to the call on max is crappy but it is the rule. god
What is the rule.....? Considering it was not a pass to stajan, but a pass from Roy?
The rule would state that Stajan interfered with max. or that it was a loose puck and fair game, no?
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:54:32 PM
hahahahahaahahahah, i was told the refs are brutal and completely one sided when the leafs play. that has proven not to be the case at all, we have seen one marginal bad call in this game with a period to go. we have also seen a goal by the sabres that you guys fail to discuss, if it was miller on the ground you guys would have freaked.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:55:30 PM
And I'm not saying the refs are hceating, or the game is fixed, or even they knew.....
But the fact is of the 4 penalties, two were complete BS, one was a high stick after the leaf guy held the stick, and one was legit.
They missed on paetsch.
Regardless....if you start a thread about good or bad calls this is the kind of analysis you're gonna get....
how can i high stick be BS. he hit him the face. you guys are proving my point, you are all crazy homers who can't see why the sabres are losing tonight. it's called being outworked cause yo uare tired.
ICRockets
January 11th, 2007, 8:55:52 PM
hahahahahaahahahah, i was told the refs are brutal and completely one sided when the leafs play. that has proven not to be the case at all, we have seen one marginal bad call in this game with a period to go. we have also seen a goal by the sabres that you guys fail to discuss, if it was miller on the ground you guys would have freaked.
Did the whistle blow? Nope.
"It was the right call" only works one way, does it?
TRIPLE P
January 11th, 2007, 8:56:37 PM
how can i high stick be BS. he hit him the face. you guys are proving my point, you are all crazy homers who can't see why the sabres are losing tonight
A high stick can be BS when the other player grabs and hold the stick.....if you take my stick and hold it while I'm skating how should I control it?
TRIPLE P
January 11th, 2007, 8:57:09 PM
back to the game
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:57:56 PM
Did the whistle blow? Nope.
"It was the right call" only works one way, does it?
dude, i know it was the right call because i am not a homer. if it was the other way around you would be going crazy calling the refs bias.
penalty #8. holding on stajan.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 8:58:34 PM
A high stick can be BS when the other player grabs and hold the stick.....if you take my stick and hold it while I'm skating how should I control it?
what a joke, pathetic. yeah ondrus grabbed the stick and bashed into his own face. pathetic.
TRIPLE P
January 11th, 2007, 9:06:20 PM
what a joke, pathetic. yeah ondrus grabbed the stick and bashed into his own face. pathetic.
Are you not watching the game?
Oh, thats right... obviously not.
"Slow pass".......i forgot.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 9:10:42 PM
ok boss, how about the leafs 3rd goal. what did the refs do to cause that one?
TRIPLE P
January 11th, 2007, 9:17:51 PM
ok boss, how about the leafs 3rd goal. what did the refs do to cause that one?
Nothing....nobody said they did.....
All I've commented on are the actual facts....not what I "thought" I saw...
*The High Stick* Did Ondrus grab the stick...? yes. So its either 2 calls or no calls.
*Max* Did Stajan get a "slow pass"? no.... No call or interference on Stajan since Roy passed the puck.
*The Trip* Did the guy fall on his own? Absolutely....no call..
Quit your "novice hockey watcher" holier than thou bullshit.....You're wrong...you started a thread asking about BS calls....3 are clearly BS...now you can't handle it....
Like I said earlier...you're either willfully ignoring the facts, or have no clue what you're watching...which is it?
beTough54
January 11th, 2007, 9:22:46 PM
This is ****ing ridiculous. Let the Leafs get a lead and then put the whistles away. The Leafs apparently have free reign to hook slash and grab as much as they want now.
MLLE2383
January 11th, 2007, 9:23:53 PM
THIS IS AWFUL.....Leafs are winning, so the whistles are put away, complete and utter nonsense
Way to get the Leafs back into playoff contention, that's the only way they are going to beat us from here on in
MAN HOW SWEET WOULD IT BE IF WE STILL WON THIS GAME!!!!
BLOW QUEEFS BLOW
anEinherjer
January 11th, 2007, 9:27:29 PM
Yeah, I'm watching Roy get mugged repeatedly, he's getting pissed off... but I guess it's okay because it's the queefs and Roy's just a diver.
:rolleyes:
Give it up, daddy, you gotta love that they put the damn whistles away after the queefs took the lead.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 9:29:21 PM
haha, this is why i started this. you can't admit your team got dominated tonight by a bad team. it was the same vs the canes last year. my little experiement worked perfectly, not a single person has commented on the great work ethic shown tonight. not one person has mentioned the fact the sabres look tired after lastnight. i knew the true homers would come out and blame the refs.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 9:29:51 PM
put them away? the sabres are on a 4-3 right now.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 9:33:42 PM
ok that one on drury was a penalty, clearly slashed
TRIPLE P
January 11th, 2007, 9:36:59 PM
haha, this is why i started this. you can't admit your team got dominated tonight by a bad team. it was the same vs the canes last year. my little experiement worked perfectly, not a single person has commented on the great work ethic shown tonight. not one person has mentioned the fact the sabres look tired after lastnight. i knew the true homers would come out and blame the refs.
What the hell are you talking about?
Why the **** would anyone comment on the leafs work ethic, or that the Sabres look tired in a thread about closely watching the penalty calls?
But fine...we'll use BDuff logic tonight:
BDuff, why didn't you comment about George Bushes plan for the war in this thread tonight? Just as I suspected!
Seriously?
Laughable. Just cause you can't stay on topic in your own threads doesn't mean everyone can't.
bduff54
January 11th, 2007, 9:39:47 PM
What the hell are you talking about?
Why the **** would anyone comment on the leafs work ethic, or that the Sabres look tired in a thread about closely watching the penalty calls?
But fine...we'll use BDuff logic tonight:
BDuff, why didn't you comment about George Bushes plan for the war in this thread tonight? Just as I suspected!
Seriously?
Laughable. Just cause you can't stay on topic in your own threads doesn't mean everyone can't.
don't you see? i wanted you to all comment on the game and watch the refs. Not one of you mentioned a single bad call by the refs that went agains the leafs? not one of you mentioned the hold by paetch, the slash by roy, the trip by vanek? i saw them but i know they are part of the game and refs let them go to keep it flowing. you guys only commented on the plays you felt went against the sabres. you don't see that?
TRIPLE P
January 11th, 2007, 9:43:09 PM
don't you see? i wanted you to all comment on the game and watch the refs. Not one of you mentioned a single bad call by the refs that went agains the leafs? not one of you mentioned the hold by paetch, the slash by roy, the trip by vanek? i saw them but i know they are part of the game and refs let them go to keep it flowing. you guys only commented on the plays you felt went against the sabres. you don't see that?
I did mention the Paestch call.... musta been that BDuff awareness at work again.
And which call sent the leafs to the box when they didn't desreve it....
Probably shoulda blwon the whistle on Vaneks goal too.....
But why would you start a thread asking people to watch the refs and then not comment?
ICRockets
January 11th, 2007, 9:48:42 PM
you guys only commented on the plays you felt went against the sabres. you don't see that?
Hey, does anyone remember what this thread was supposed to be about? Was it about calls that benefit the Leafs, like we've been discussing for 3 pages? Nah, that can't be it.
Oh, wait that is EXACTLY what the thread's about. But it's ok, bduff, I can't expect you to know that. After all, it's not like you started it or anything...
Carl J. Ironsides
January 11th, 2007, 9:57:36 PM
What else is new? More Toronto-favored reffing.
MacRazor
January 11th, 2007, 10:26:09 PM
Homers?
Hello pot, this is kettle,"YOUR BLACK!"
unklechucky
January 11th, 2007, 11:32:33 PM
:rofl:
jc44
January 12th, 2007, 7:09:39 AM
Just a quick question, first they Sab's played poor last night and did not deserve to win. They were outworked.
But while we are on the subject of interference, when the D-men are going back for the puck and they stop shot of the put to hit the man chasing him first so they dont get hit is that not interference? He didn't play the puck, that play baffles me every time.
Any thoughts?
bduff54
January 12th, 2007, 7:14:53 AM
haha, i love it.
TRIPLE P
January 12th, 2007, 8:19:19 AM
Nothing....nobody said they did.....
All I've commented on are the actual facts....not what I "thought" I saw...
*The High Stick* Did Ondrus grab the stick...? yes. So its either 2 calls or no calls.
*Max* Did Stajan get a "slow pass"? no.... No call or interference on Stajan since Roy passed the puck.
*The Trip* Did the guy fall on his own? Absolutely....no call..
Quit your "novice hockey watcher" holier than thou bullshit.....You're wrong...you started a thread asking about BS calls....3 are clearly BS...now you can't handle it....
Like I said earlier...you're either willfully ignoring the facts, or have no clue what you're watching...which is it?
haha, i love it.
You haven't addressed this yet...or refuted it?
Do you have a point?
bduff54
January 12th, 2007, 8:22:24 AM
You haven't addressed this yet...or refuted it?
Do you have a point?
what am i adressing? ok spacek high sticked the guy in the face that is a 2 minute penalty in any part of the world. Even if ondrus grabbed his stick for a second that stuff happens all the time. how is the ref supposed to see that.
The call on max sucks but it is the rule, i have seen it called a thousand times since the new NHL began.
The trip on spacek was a bad call, i already admitted that.
TRIPLE P
January 12th, 2007, 8:30:35 AM
what am i adressing? ok spacek high sticked the guy in the face that is a 2 minute penalty in any part of the world. Even if ondrus grabbed his stick for a second that stuff happens all the time. how is the ref supposed to see that.
The call on max sucks but it is the rule, i have seen it called a thousand times since the new NHL began.
The trip on spacek was a bad call, i already admitted that.
Grabbing a stick is grabbing a stick.....might have been missed...should have been called.
Max was interfered with in his attempt to retrieve a slow pass from roy.....you said yourself that this would have been the case had the pass been to stajan....but it wasn't.
bduff54
January 12th, 2007, 8:39:48 AM
Grabbing a stick is grabbing a stick.....might have been missed...should have been called.
Max was interfered with in his attempt to retrieve a slow pass from roy.....you said yourself that this would have been the case had the pass been to stajan....but it wasn't.
but stajan never hit hit him, stajan was reaching for the puck. wow.
its hard for the refs to see people grabbing the stick sometimes, they can be blocked off easily, it is way easier to call a high stick when you see it hit his face. if every little grab and pull was called you would have 40 PP's a game, is that what you want? ok, so just to finish this off. The Sabres lost because of the refs, right?
BillsfaninVirginia
January 12th, 2007, 8:45:13 AM
penalty #2: cross check on Mccabe. Probably a penalty, nice little flop by briere too
nice dive by Kubina.....and u say Briere dives....GOOD LORD, what a joke by Kubina
bduff54
January 12th, 2007, 8:45:58 AM
nice dive by Kubina.....and u say Briere dives....GOOD LORD, what a joke by Kubina
yep, he definitely bailed on that play. no doubt about. i do say Briere dives too . do you? i bet you don't
anEinherjer
January 12th, 2007, 9:01:37 AM
"Look at me everyone, I'm 'fair-minded'!"
:rolleyes:
Stajan was just an innocent bystander who got mugged by an angry Russian! :rofl:
bduff54
January 12th, 2007, 9:10:08 AM
"Look at me everyone, I'm 'fair-minded'!"
:rolleyes:
Stajan was just an innocent bystander who got mugged by an angry Russian! :rofl:
basically i guess, the rules i wrong and i hate it but is still the rule. Max outworked stajan and got penalized for it.
anEinherjer
January 12th, 2007, 10:26:32 AM
:rofl:
Oh man. So if Max had fallen down, Stajan would have gotten the penalty?
bduff54
January 12th, 2007, 10:38:29 AM
:rofl:
Oh man. So if Max had fallen down, Stajan would have gotten the penalty?
no, because stajan did not throw the hit.
vBulletin® v3.7.0, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.