PDA

View Full Version : why is Paste'ch playing? Sekera has got to be the man...

noocllez
December 14th, 2006, 8:37:25 PM
why is Paste'ch playing? Sekera has got to be the man...

I think he earned it and he's apparently much better then pastie...
buffalofan19
December 14th, 2006, 9:13:59 PM
It's all about salary. They can't afford to keep another guy up right now. Also, Paetsch can't go back to Rochester without clearing waivers first. Sekera can.
Denverbillsfan
December 14th, 2006, 9:16:53 PM
Because his parents are there for the first time to watch him play a pro hockey game.
noocllez
December 14th, 2006, 9:32:43 PM
lol
Sabres244
December 14th, 2006, 11:01:10 PM
I have no problem with Nate playing, he doing fine and will be a part of the future
THATHURMANATOR
December 14th, 2006, 11:01:50 PM
What is wrong with Paetch? He is playing fine IMO.
coreyl519
December 14th, 2006, 11:02:45 PM
Paetsch has played fine, they need to try him on the PP, he has a WICKED shot. Also as you can tell he can hold his own fight wise, whether the guy is out of his league or not, he aint scared of shit.
toast"r
December 15th, 2006, 12:46:42 AM
Paetsch has proven himself to be here... get off his back and quit being so negative..... your just being a ***** now.... grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Iggy72
December 15th, 2006, 12:55:03 AM
Paestch is holding his own very well. I know he got schooled by Ovechkin, but he's not the only one. He'll be our #7 defenseman when Hank and Teppo are 100%, which is a lot better than our situation last year.

Pax.
Iggy72
pigpen65
December 15th, 2006, 1:01:30 AM
Paetsch had games last year, so by default he's top of the depth chart for the young guys. Honestly though, i don't really trust him. I'm hoping Darcy will rent a vet at the deadline.
Bay Side
December 15th, 2006, 6:50:03 AM
He hasn't been that bad, but has looked bad at times and great at times...I do like Sekera's game!!
SabresMB3
December 15th, 2006, 7:40:57 AM
He is playing very well and has the experience as of right now, I was definantly impressed with Sekeras play, he will be our fill in guy I am sure or unless Nate starts playing very poorly
SHINEdown30
December 15th, 2006, 7:49:23 AM
Sekera hasn't even played 5 games. Why are we already crowning him? Nate is acutally playing well enough we can have him out on the ice for longer times and gives the other d-man breaks.
JLB
December 15th, 2006, 8:23:57 AM
Sekera hasn't even played 5 games. Why are we already crowning him? Nate is acutally playing well enough we can have him out on the ice for longer times and gives the other d-man breaks.

Exactly what's the rush.
Denverbillsfan
December 15th, 2006, 9:50:36 AM
Yes, I would leave Paesch in before playing Sekera.
SabresFan220
December 15th, 2006, 11:04:26 PM
I'd be in favor of playing both guys if we had the luxary of doing so. It bodes well for our defensive depth to get both guys ice time should a slue of freak injuries happen to our defense again. I think we should give Teppo a few games off during the season to keep him fresh and healthy for the playoffs. I think he got hurt because he got worn down last season, he played probably 75 games or something like that in the regular season. I trust him back there for the playoffs, and I think I'll be able to trust Paestch by then too.